From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf BPF/elfdep intermitent build problems
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:29:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564D33F3.9050004@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564D323A.1050200@huawei.com>
On 2015/11/19 10:21, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/11/19 9:24, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2015/11/19 6:44, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Have you guys ever saw this?
>>>
>>> [acme@zoo linux]$ alias m
>>> alias m='perf stat -e cycles make O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf
>>> install-bin'
>>> [acme @zoo linux]$ m
>>> make: Entering directory '/home/git/linux/tools/perf'
>>> BUILD: Doing 'make -j4' parallel build
>>> make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'fixdep'.
>>> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/machine.o
>>> LD /tmp/build/perf/util/libperf-in.o
>>> No libelf found
>>> BPF API too old
>>
>> This error message means the kernel header in rootfs is too old,
>> causes tools/build/feature/test-bpf.c failed to be built.
>
> Strange... even in feature detection it should check BPF API through
> kernel source where you are using to build perf...
>
> I guess you are not using NFS or share it with other people?
>
>>
>>> Makefile:191: recipe for target 'elfdep' failed
>>> make[2]: *** [elfdep] Error 255
>>> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>> Makefile:194: recipe for target 'bpfdep' failed
>>> make[2]: *** [bpfdep] Error 255
>>> Makefile.perf:434: recipe for target '/tmp/build/perf/libbpf.a' failed
>>> make[1]: *** [/tmp/build/perf/libbpf.a] Error 2
>>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>> LD /tmp/build/perf/libperf-in.o
>>> Makefile:87: recipe for target 'install-bin' failed
>>> make: *** [install-bin] Error 2
>>> make: Leaving directory '/home/git/linux/tools/perf'
>>>
>>> Performance counter stats for 'make O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf
>>> install-bin':
>>>
>>> 10,265,920,369 cycles
>>>
>>> 3.002799545 seconds time elapsed
>>>
>>> [acme@zoo linux]$
>>>
>>>
>>> If I go and try doing a clean on the libbpf dir I see another problem:
>>>
>>> [acme@zoo linux]$ cd tools/lib/bpf
>>> [acme@zoo bpf]$ make clean
>>>
>>> Auto-detecting system features:
>>> ... libelf: [ OFF ]
>>> ... bpf: [ OFF ]
>>>
>>> CLEAN libbpf
>>> CLEAN core-gen
>>> [acme@zoo bpf]$
>>>
>>> No need for feature detection when doing a plain 'make clean', right?
>>>
>
> Right. It should be
>
> $ cd tools/lib/bpf
> $ make clean
> CLEAN libbpf
> CLEAN core-gen
> $
>
>
> After cleaning can you trigger this problem again?
>
Tiggered part of your problem:
$ make
Auto-detecting system features:
... libelf: [ on ]
... bpf: [ on ]
CC libbpf.o
CC bpf.o
LD libbpf-in.o
LINK libbpf.a
LINK libbpf.so
$ make clean
CLEAN libbpf
CLEAN core-gen
$ make clean
Auto-detecting system features:
... libelf: [ on ]
... bpf: [ on ]
CLEAN libbpf
CLEAN core-gen
Feature check would be triggered the second time we make clean.
Will look into it.
Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-18 22:44 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-19 1:24 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 2:21 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 2:29 ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2015-11-19 8:46 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-27 15:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-19 11:50 ` Wangnan (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564D33F3.9050004@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome