From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752122AbbKWKgl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 05:36:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:37256 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751935AbbKWKgh (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 05:36:37 -0500 Subject: Re: nfnetlink warnings To: Borislav Petkov References: <20151123093607.GA5134@pd.tnic> <5652E12E.3070500@profitbricks.com> <20151123095455.GB5134@pd.tnic> <5652E862.7000605@profitbricks.com> <20151123103212.GD5134@pd.tnic> Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, lkml From: Michael Wang Message-ID: <5652EC32.4020902@profitbricks.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:36:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151123103212.GD5134@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/23/2015 11:32 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:20:18AM +0100, Michael Wang wrote: >> Who want to do that would take responsibility to make an else branch at >> that time, but reserve the branch at this moment sounds unnecessary, and >> not that pretty frankly speaking. > > Actually, I was looking for the better idea which doesn't uglify the > code. And here it is: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5585663.OcpAQiytKY@wuerfel Looks even better :-) Regards, Michael Wang > > :-) >