mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: rtc_cmos platform device requires legacy irqs
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:06:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56605A5B.6000506@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mvtr7p2s.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>

On 03/12/15 11:23, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> writes:
> 
>> Adding the rtc platform device when there are no legacy irqs (no
>> legacy PIC)
> 
> No PIC != No legacy IRQs, Hyper-V Gen2 represents such a platform (and
> it has RTC on irq8). I've tested this patch against it and it appears to
> work because the device is present in ACPI and we initialize it in
> drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c, add_rtc_cmos() bails out in the very
> beginning as we see PNP0b00 device.

It's not a legacy IRQ if it isn't going via the legacy PIC, it just
happens to have the same number.

I think it is safe to assume that any machine with a CMOS RTC but no PNP
information is also going to have a legacy PIC.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-03 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-03 10:43 David Vrabel
2015-12-03 11:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-12-03 15:06   ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-12-04 14:06 ` David Vrabel
2015-12-04 15:24   ` David Vrabel
2015-12-04 15:35     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-04 15:52       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-12-04 16:14         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-08 21:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-08 21:15       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-08 21:27         ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56605A5B.6000506@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome