From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: <acme@kernel.org>, <jolsa@kernel.org>, <namhyung@kernel.or>,
<lizefan@huawei.com>, <pi3orama@163.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf tools: Add -lutil in python lib list for broken python-config
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:50:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56937ADD.3050006@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56937977.1040203@huawei.com>
On 2016/1/11 17:44, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>
>
> On 2016/1/11 17:28, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:23:56PM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
>>> On some system the perf-config is broken, causes link failure like
>>> this:
>>>
>>> /usr/lib64/python2.7/config/libpython2.7.a(posixmodule.o): In
>>> function `posix_forkpty':
>>> /opt/wangnan/yocto-build/tmp-eglibc/work/x86_64-oe-linux/python/2.7.3-r0.3.1/Python-2.7.3/./Modules/posixmodule.c:3816:
>>> undefined reference to `forkpty'
>>> /usr/lib64/python2.7/config/libpython2.7.a(posixmodule.o): In
>>> function `posix_openpty':
>>> /opt/wangnan/yocto-build/tmp-eglibc/work/x86_64-oe-linux/python/2.7.3-r0.3.1/Python-2.7.3/./Modules/posixmodule.c:3756:
>>> undefined reference to `openpty'
>>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>> make[1]: *** [/home/wangnan/kernel-hydrogen/tools/perf/out/perf]
>>> Error 1
>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>
>>> $ python-config --libs
>>> -lpthread -ldl -lpthread -lutil -lm -lpython2.7
>> so your 'python-config --libs' shows -lutil and you still get the
>> build failure?
>>
>> after your fix I can see double -lutil in PYTHON_EMBED_LIBADD,
>> which is probably not a problem but could be ommited I think
>
> In my python-config:
>
> # python-config
> -lpthread -ldl -lpthread -lutil -lm -lpython2.7
>
> There are multiple -lpthread already. In fact multiple '-l' options is
> not
> a problem at all. Please see below.
>
>>> In this case a '-lutil' should be appended to -lpython2.7.
>>>
>>> (I know we have --start-group and --end-group. I can see them in
>>> command line of collect2 by strace. However it doesn't work. Seems
>>> I have a broken environment?)
>> hum, how is this related to start/end -group options?
>
> Please check man page of ld:
>
> <quote>
> --start-group archives --end-group
> The archives should be a list of archive files. They may be either
> explicit file names, or -l options.
>
> The specified archives are searched repeatedly until no new
> undefined references are created. Normally, an archive is searched
> only once in the order that it is specified on the command line. If a
> symbol in that archive is needed to resolve an undefined symbol
> referred to by an object in an archive that appears later on the
> command line, the linker would not be able to resolve that reference.
> By grouping the archives, they all be searched repeatedly until all
> possible references are resolved.
>
> Using this option has a significant performance cost. It is best
> to use it only when there are unavoidable circular references between
> two or more archives.
> </quote>
>
> Without --start/end-group, if we provide -l in this order:
>
> ... -la -lb -lc ...
>
> and libb.a requires a symbol in liba.a, link would fail. The simplest way
> to avoid this is to add another -la after -lb:
>
> ... -la -lb -la -lc ...
>
> In my environment it works as if we don't provide -Wl,--start-group
> and -Wl,--end-group.
> I don't know why.
>
I mean the python case before I add -lutil after python libs.
-Wl,--start-group and -Wl,--end-group
seems not work for me. They are issued, I confirm this in strace output.
Thank you.
> Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-11 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-08 14:23 [PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Improve 'make build-test' Wang Nan
2016-01-08 14:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf tools: Add -lutil in python lib list for broken python-config Wang Nan
2016-01-11 9:28 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-11 9:44 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-11 9:50 ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2016-01-12 9:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-08 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf tools: Add missing headers in perf's MANIFEST Wang Nan
2016-01-09 16:37 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Add missing headers in perf' s MANIFEST tip-bot for Wang Nan
2016-01-11 9:43 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Add missing sources in perf's MANIFEST Jiri Olsa
2016-01-11 9:46 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-11 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-08 14:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Fix phony build target for build-test Wang Nan
2016-01-11 9:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-08 14:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf tools: Set parallel making options build-test Wang Nan
2016-01-11 9:38 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf tools: Pass O option to Makefile.perf in build-test Wang Nan
2016-01-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf tools: Test correct path of perf " Wang Nan
2016-01-08 14:32 ` [PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Improve 'make build-test' Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-11 2:55 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-11 8:46 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56937ADD.3050006@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.or \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome