From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932354AbcAMRjJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:39:09 -0500 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:38007 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932182AbcAMRjG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:39:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: omap5-board-common: enable rtc and charging of backup battery To: Grygorii Strashko , Tony Lindgren References: <832803EE-E4CB-46B1-BF39-2DC0BB695A5D@goldelico.com> <20160108190457.GY12777@atomide.com> <20160111202421.GA12777@atomide.com> <20160112000917.GC12777@atomide.com> <417BBA32-A7DC-40CD-8A6B-EA910B1C9C13@goldelico.com> <001346CD-CF31-4FEF-B406-B89EEBDFA063@goldelico.com> <56966558.1070608@ti.com> <569669C5.2070200@ti.com> <20160113164856.GF12777@atomide.com> <56968596.2070105@ti.com> CC: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , Laxman Dewangan , =?UTF-8?Q?Beno=c3=aet_Cousson?= , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , linux-omap , , LKML , Marek Belisko , =?UTF-8?Q?Gra=c5=bevydas_Ignotas?= , Keerthy From: Nishanth Menon Message-ID: <56968B9C.1060600@ti.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:38:36 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56968596.2070105@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/13/2016 11:12 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 01/13/2016 06:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: [...] >> Care to dig up some more information on that? > > i can't find this report, sry - as i remember there was difference > between some OMAP4 HS and GP SoCs. > > But links on commits for old 3.4 kernel below: > http://omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=commitdiff;h=a7a516be9338eabc9a7682e7433fa34d86c1f208 > http://omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=commitdiff;h=262669aebf4af4044a25e8292f0e27986e18445a > >> >> I don't have anything against adding GPIO handling to the TWL driver >> so it can be optionally specified. But that's clearly a separate patch >> and should be done by somebody who knows more about the issue and has >> a test case needing the GPIO logic for this pin. >> > > if it helps in anyways http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-May/170707.html -- Regards, Nishanth Menon