From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755441Ab1IPRDe (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:03:34 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:54683 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751683Ab1IPRDd (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:03:33 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3-dev To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Russell King , Mark Brown , Axel Lin , Harald Welte , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [linux-next] ASoC: sound/soc/samsung/neo1973_wm8753.c build failure In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:53:04 +0200." <4E71E720.7040008@metafoo.de> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1315991893.17271.2.camel@phoenix> <20110914191917.GA30518@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110914232808.GC2953@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110914233838.GB22946@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110915094640.GA7988@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110915110056.GA32615@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4E71E720.7040008@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1316192529_55056P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:02:09 -0400 Message-ID: <56969.1316192529@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=steiner.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A010206.4E738115.0085,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1316192529_55056P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:53:04 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen said: > On 09/15/2011 01:00 PM, Russell King wrote: > > [...] > > We now have a sane policy: entries which aren't fully up to date are > > automatically dropped. Entries for which there is no platform support > > file merged within 12 months of the entries last edit are dropped also > > automatically dropped. > > Partly unrelated, but what about these platforms which can be fully described > with DT and don't need a platform file? Then those platforms won't notice if their now-unused entries evaporate out of the platform file, right? --==_Exmh_1316192529_55056P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFOc4ERcC3lWbTT17ARAmjWAJwIcfH9HqMH9fpYfHq20Q7oyapV1QCcDMic mdI3buT+ZL199AOtx8JWznE= =/Nsl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1316192529_55056P--