mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] selftests: use INSTALL_HDR_PATH instead of relative paths
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:17:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569783D7.5000303@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452742640.25808.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>



On 14/01/16 03:37, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 14:22 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>> The selftests build fails or picks up wrong headers when cross-compiling
>> and build directory is different from source as the headers are referred
>> using the relative paths.
>>
>> This patch use $INSTALL_HDR_PATH to fix the compilation. It also removes
>> installing the headers.
>>
>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/Makefile | 2 +-
>>   tools/testing/selftests/memfd/Makefile      | 2 +-
>>   tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile        | 2 +-
>>   tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile         | 7 ++-----
>>   4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When I was cross-compiling these tests for arm{32,64}, I faced issues.
>> With limited knowledge I have on this build system, I came up with this
>> patch. Please treat this as bug report if this approach makes no-sense
>> and suggest on how to fix it.
>
> Yeah sorry that doesn't work.
>
> If $(INSTALL_HDR_PATH) isn't defined you end up with:
>
>    gcc -Wall -I /include  -o compaction_test compaction_test.c -lrt
>                 ^
>

Ah OK, I got carried away by below in the main Makefile.

#Default location for installed headers
export INSTALL_HDR_PATH = $(objtree)/usr

> Which is wrong.
>
> INSTALL_HDR_PATH will not be defined when the tests are built standalone, ie.
> like:
>
>    $ make -C tools/testing/selftests
>

Thanks for pointing this out. I had totally forgotten about that.

>
> This has been on my todo list to fix, but it doesn't actually bother me so I
> haven't got around to it.
>
> Does the patch below work for you? It uses INSTALL_HDR_PATH if it is defined,
> or otherwise KERNEL_HEADERS if it is defined, or finally it guesses at
> ../../../usr/include (ie. the base of the source tree).
>

Yes it does work fine. So feel free to add my tested-by when you post
the patch. Thanks for the quick and clean fix.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-14 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-11 14:22 Sudeep Holla
2016-01-14  3:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-01-14 11:17   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-01-26 11:57     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-01-28 21:19       ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569783D7.5000303@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome