mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot problem on PPC with 4.4-git - Bisected to commit 21266be
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:40:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569FF0C3.5040103@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gzcjEke=w5dTAwgp89T90mYCC5qtu8boP5u-ybrr0mpA@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/20/2016 02:16 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Larry Finger
>> <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> wrote:
>>> My PowerBook G4 Aluminum with a 32-bit PPC processor fails to boot for the
>>> 4.4-git series. The problem was bisected to commit 21266be. It took a while
>>> to figure out why a commit that only rearranges the Kconfig files could
>>> cause the problem.
>>>
>>> The answer came when I read the commit message for 90a545e98126 and saw that
>>> "Recompiling with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM=n" might be necessary. After I
>>> made that change, the system boots.
>>>
>>> If it is the graphics hardware driver at fault, the VGA controller is listed
>>> as an ATI RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10] with PCI ID 1002:4350. It uses
>>> radeon as the driver.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if this is a bug in the configuration, but I know that
>>> selecting the default answer to all the new configuration parameters leaves
>>> me with a machine that is unbootable.
>>
>> I agree that the default configuration should remain bootable.  I'll
>> send a change that does not force that default.
>>
>> Thanks for the report and sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> Are you sure that the bisect is pointing to "21266be9ed54 arch:
> consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in lib/Kconfig.debug" and not
> "90a545e98126 restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges"?  The
> default for CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM should be unchanged in 21266be9ed54,
> it's not until 90a545e98126 that I would expect a behavior change.

Yes. Commit 21266be9ed54 was the reported bad commit; however, the previous test 
kernel was 90a545e98126. In fact, I was struck that the final bisection build 
did not change any object files, thus you are right that 90a545e98126 is likely 
the bad commit.

Larry

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-20 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 20:01 Larry Finger
2016-01-20 20:08 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-20 20:16   ` Dan Williams
2016-01-20 20:33     ` Dan Williams
2016-01-20 21:36       ` Larry Finger
2016-01-20 22:19         ` Dan Williams
2016-01-20 20:40     ` Larry Finger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569FF0C3.5040103@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome