From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965424AbcAUOvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:51:16 -0500 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:32990 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965248AbcAUOvM (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:51:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alexandre Belloni References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> <56A02791.9010409@samsung.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi , Laxman Dewangan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <56A0F053.6070405@osg.samsung.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:50:59 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56A02791.9010409@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 01/20/2016 09:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 21.01.2016 09:30, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >>> I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or >>> wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. >>> >> >> I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. > > That would be preferred but merging them before the 5/8 would cause a > loss of functionality on these defconfigs making it non-bisectable Exactly, that's why I suggested merging all through RTC with proper acks. > approach. I think it would be good to preserve bisectability in that > matter so either: > 1. a tag from RTC on top of which these patches would be applied in arm-soc, I didn't suggest that option because I thought it would be a lot of burden for such a trivial change. > 2. take them to RTC tree with our acks. > Or another option is to not pick the defconfig changes and I can repost those again once the RTC changes land into mainline. But of course if up to you to decide since I'm not a maintainer :) > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America