From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753743AbcAVO40 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:56:26 -0500
Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:37920 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753636AbcAVO4Z (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:56:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
References: <1453417415-19110-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
 <56A166E7.3070601@osg.samsung.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601220852430.3886@nanos>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>, Harald Hoyer <harald@redhat.com>,
        Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Organization: Samsung Open Source Group
Message-ID: <56A24306.7070807@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:56:06 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601220852430.3886@nanos>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 01/22/2016 12:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 01/21/2016 04:03 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the
>>> changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET
>>> when used with ADJ_NANO.
>>>
>>> I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced
>>> more unit tests to validate these going forward.
>>>
>>> Thomas: Can you queue the first patch for tip/timers/urgent?
>>>
>>> Shuah: The kselftests patch can wait to the next merge window
>>> if you'd prefer.
>>
>> Yeah. Probably it has to wait until the next merge window as
>> this is a new test. I can pull this into linux-kselftest next
>> after merge window closes.
> 
> We really should not delay selftests, especially if they have been written
> along with a fix for a recently detected problem.
> 

Thomas,

Yes. That is why I have "probably" in my response.
Could you please fold this test in with your urgent
fix, so they can go in together.

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>

thanks,
-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978