From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757207AbcAYO4b (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:56:31 -0500 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.243]:54248 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755678AbcAYO42 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:56:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] crypto: atmel-sha: fix registration issue and other bugs To: Herbert Xu References: <20160125144849.GH8840@gondor.apana.org.au> CC: , , , , From: Cyrille Pitchen Message-ID: <56A63798.5050208@atmel.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:56:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160125144849.GH8840@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.161.30.18] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Herbert, Le 25/01/2016 15:48, Herbert Xu a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:49:30PM +0100, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This series of patches fixes many issues such as the algo registration failure >> or the broken support of context switches. >> >> This series was applied to linux-next and tested on a sama5d2 xplained >> ultra board. We now pass the tcrypt tests in the following modes: >> - 2: sha1 >> - 6: sha256 >> - 11: sha384 >> - 12: sha512 >> - 33: sha224 >> >> The context switch fix was tested with a userspace program using the cryptodev >> module. This single thread program computes the SHA256 hashes of many files >> by splitting then into fixed size chunks. The chunks of each file are >> processed by calling 'update' operations using a round robin algorithm. >> >> However, the .import() / .export() implementation was NOT tested! >> Nonetheless the last patch is needed to fix the registration issue, otherwise >> atmel_sha_probe() would still fail. > > Patch 1-4 applied. Please fix the alignment issue with patch 5. > OK, I will fix it soon! Best regards, Cyrille