From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753222AbcBIF2L (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:28:11 -0500
Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:2037 "EHLO
	hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751348AbcBIF2J (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:28:09 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed;
	by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:28:34 -0800
Message-ID: <56B97632.1000208@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:46:34 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>, <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
        <javier@osg.samsung.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <a.zummo@towertech.it>, <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/6] regmap: irq: add apis to unmap the mapped irq
References: <1454769447-785-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1454769447-785-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20160208145550.GE7265@sirena.org.uk> <56B8C484.7000309@nvidia.com> <20160208165912.GK7265@sirena.org.uk> <56B8C8B4.4050207@nvidia.com> <20160208181908.GM7265@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20160208181908.GM7265@sirena.org.uk>
X-Originating-IP: [10.19.65.30]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DRUKMAIL102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.20) To
 bgmail102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.11)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On Monday 08 February 2016 11:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:20PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> So fix need to go in the irq_domain_remove() to unamp before actually
>> destroying the irq domain?
> That's one option, but you could also do this at the regmap-irq level.
>

Do we need to dispose all virtual irq in regmap_del_irq_chip() before 
actually removing domain?
This means we need to store the created virq  in regmap_irq_chip_data 
for disposing it when removing the irq domain.