From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751390AbcBKFed (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:34:33 -0500 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:44105 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750783AbcBKFeb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:34:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] mtd: devices: m25p80: add support for mmap read request To: Mark Brown References: <1449807000-6457-1-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com> <1449807000-6457-4-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com> <20160209193616.GN13270@sirena.org.uk> CC: Tony Lindgren , Brian Norris , Rob Herring , Russell King , , , , , , , From: Vignesh R Message-ID: <56BC1D3E.5020203@ti.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:03:50 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160209193616.GN13270@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/10/2016 01:06 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:39:58AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: > >> + if (spi_flash_read_supported(spi)) { >> + struct spi_flash_read_message msg; >> + int ret; >> + >> + msg.buf = buf; >> + msg.from = from; >> + msg.len = len; >> + msg.read_opcode = nor->read_opcode; >> + msg.addr_width = nor->addr_width; >> + msg.dummy_bytes = dummy; >> + /* TODO: Support other combinations */ >> + msg.opcode_nbits = SPI_NBITS_SINGLE; >> + msg.addr_nbits = SPI_NBITS_SINGLE; >> + msg.data_nbits = m25p80_rx_nbits(nor); >> + >> + ret = spi_flash_read(spi, &msg); >> + *retlen = msg.retlen; >> + return ret; > > Looking at this I can't help but think that spi_flash_read() ought to > have the stub in rather than the caller. But given that we're pretty > much only ever expecting one user I'm not 100% sure it actually matters. Well, my initial patch set passed long list of arguments to spi_flash_read(), but Brian suggested to use struct[1] in order to avoid unnecessary churn when things need changed in the API. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/11/454 -- Regards Vignesh