From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751962AbcBOPlY (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:41:24 -0500 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:59302 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751799AbcBOPlV (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:41:21 -0500 Subject: Re: arm qemu test failures due to 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of compatibles' To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=c3=b6nig?= References: <20160214165010.GA3189@roeck-us.net> <20160215105909.GH12289@pengutronix.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <56C1F19F.8090100@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:41:19 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160215105909.GH12289@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/15/2016 02:59 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Guenter, > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:50:10AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Uwe, >> >> Your patch 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of >> compatibles' causes the following qemu tests to crash in -next. >> >> arm:vexpress-a9:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 >> arm:vexpress-a15:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 >> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9 >> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1 >> >> Crash log: >> >> VFS: Cannot open root device "mmcblk0" or unknown-block(0,0): error -6 >> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions: >> 1f00 131072 mtdblock0 (driver?) >> 1f01 32768 mtdblock1 (driver?) >> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) > > Can you provide a complete boot log? This might already reveal which > device is failing. It might not be the mmci device but something it > depends on (clock, bus parent, irq). > Sure, something else may be failing, but why does reverting your patch fix the problem ? Anyway, complete logs are at http://kerneltests.org/builders. http://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-arm-next/builds/376/steps/qemubuildcommand/logs/stdio is the most recent log (next-20120215). Look for the vexpress crashes; the overo crash bisected to to 'PM / OPP: Disable OPPs that aren't supported by the regulator', in next-20160212, which I have not fully analyzed yet, and the beagle crashes as well as the 'new' overo crash are brand new. Guenter