From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756706AbcBWA5U (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:57:20 -0500 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.137]:42031 "EHLO regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755866AbcBWA5S (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:57:18 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 60858 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:57:16 EST X-263anti-spam: KSV:0;BIG:0;ABS:1;DNS:0;ATT:0;SPF:S; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 1 X-SKE-CHECKED: 1 X-ADDR-CHECKED: 0 X-RL-SENDER: sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-SENDER-IP: 58.22.7.114 X-LOGIN-NAME: sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <9610cf2ff873f2aeb82a62b02b99ff9b> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] patches to add support for rockchip rt5640 card To: Mark Brown References: <1456127815-68575-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com> <20160222110416.GC18327@sirena.org.uk> Cc: heiko@sntech.de, Jaroslav Kysela , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Oder Chiou , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Gala , Ian Campbell , Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Bard Liao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: sugar Message-ID: <56CBAE60.6000806@rock-chips.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:57:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160222110416.GC18327@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2/22/2016 19:04, Mark Brown 写道: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 03:56:53PM +0800, Sugar Zhang wrote: > >> Sugar Zhang (2): >> ASoC: rockchip: i2s: add default values for registers >> ASoC: rt5640: add master clock handling for rt5640 > > These appear to be commpletly unrelated patches so should each be sent > individually rather than as a series - that way there is no confusion > about them possibly depending on each other and they are easier to > review and apply. > Got it, thanks.