From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 07:02:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D30BFE.7060805@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160228140739.GA7577@spo001.leaseweb.nl>
On 02/28/2016 06:07 AM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
>>> +static int ebc_c384_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdev, unsigned t)
>>> +{
>>> + /* resolution is in minutes for timeouts greater than 255 seconds */
>>> + if (t > 255) {
>>> + /* truncate second resolution to minute resolution */
>>> + t /= 60;
>>> + wdev->timeout = t * 60;
>>> +
>>> + /* set watchdog timer for minutes */
>>> + outb(0x00, CFG_ADDR);
>>
>> If ask for 299 seconds surely I should get 300 not 240 ?
>> (Whether to round off or round up is an interesting question for the
>> middle range - does it go off early or late - I'd have said late but...)
>
> This is my preference:
> if (t > 255)
> t = (((t - 1) / 60) + 1) * 60;
>
In case I am missing something: Why not just use DIV_ROUND_UP() ?
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-28 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 19:09 William Breathitt Gray
2016-01-25 19:28 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-01-25 20:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-01-25 23:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2016-01-26 1:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-01-26 23:38 ` William Breathitt Gray
2016-01-27 5:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-01-28 0:18 ` William Breathitt Gray
2016-01-28 1:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-01-28 11:05 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-01-26 1:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-02-28 14:07 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2016-02-28 14:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2016-02-28 15:02 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-02-28 16:24 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2016-01-26 1:11 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-01-26 9:09 ` Paul Bolle
2016-01-26 12:33 ` William Breathitt Gray
2016-01-26 14:31 William Breathitt Gray
2016-01-26 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D30BFE.7060805@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome