From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hp-wmi: fix unregister order in hp_wmi_rfkill_setup() once again
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:58:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DEF6B0.9050902@maciej.szmigiero.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160308123649.GC31742@dvhart-mobl5.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Darren,
Thanks for review, see also my comments below.
On 08.03.2016 13:39, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 11:38:36PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c
>> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int __init hp_wmi_rfkill_setup(struct platform_device *device)
>> (void *) HPWMI_BLUETOOTH);
>> if (!bluetooth_rfkill) {
>> err = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto register_wifi_error;
>> + goto register_bluetooth_error;
>
> In this and all cases below, the goto label should match the situation, jumping
> to register_bluetooth_error would be incorrect as we experienced a wifi error.
Here we experienced an BT error - BT rkill allocation failed,
so jump is to "register_bluetooth_error".
The second jump to "register_bluetooth_error" is in another case of BT error:
when its rfkill registration failed.
It is the same label since if BT rfkill allocation had failed
rfkill_destroy(bluetooth_rfkill) call in cleanup does nothing but we still
need to possibly unregister WiFi rfkill that might have been registered in
a previews block (and then fall through to next label to destroy WiFi rfkill).
It would be possible to have separate jump labels skipping unnecessary
rfkill_destroy() calls on allocation failure, but this would mean
that we would have 7 labels in such small block of cleanup code.
> A better solution would be to reorder the labels in the exit block
> such that they enforce the necessary reverse order.
Cleanup labels already are in reverse order with regard to registration:
Registration:
1) WiFi,
2) BT,
3) WWAN,
5) GPS.
Cleanup:
1) GPS,
2) WWAN,
3) BT,
4) WiFi.
Best regards,
Maciej Szmigiero
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-06 22:38 Maciej S. Szmigiero
2016-03-08 12:39 ` Darren Hart
2016-03-08 15:58 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero [this message]
2016-03-08 17:01 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DEF6B0.9050902@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--to=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®