From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<acme@kernel.org>, <andihartmann@freenet.de>, <vw@iommu.org>,
<labbott@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 02/10] perf/amd/iommu: Consolidate and move perf_event_amd_iommu header
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:37:02 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E6BE7E.8010807@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160314095856.GL6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi,
On 3/14/16 16:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:26:00PM +0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/12/2016 08:22 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 08:12:36AM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>>>
>>>> First, this patch move arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.h to
>>>> arch/x86/include/asm/perf/amd/iommu.h so that we easily include
>>>> it in both perf-amd-iommu and amd-iommu drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Then, we consolidate declaration of AMD IOMMU performance counter
>>>> APIs into one file.
>>>
>>> These seem two independent thingies; should this therefore not be 2
>>> patches?
>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c | 2 +-
>>>> arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.h | 40 ---------------------------------
>>>> arch/x86/include/asm/perf/amd/iommu.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> That seems somewhat excessive. Not only do you create
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/perf/ you then put another directory on top of
>>> that.
>>>
>>
>> The original header files (arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.h and
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_proto.h) has duplicate function declarations. So,
>> with the new header file being in the arch/x86/include/asm/perf/amd/iommu.h,
>> we can just have one function declaration.
>>
>> So, you just want to separate the file moving part and the part that removes
>> of the duplication?
>
> I'm fine with a new header, it just seems putting it in a two deep
> direcotry hierarchy of its own that seems excessive.
>
Basically, we are trying to match the current Perf hierarchy for AMD
IOMMU (arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c). I can put it into
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_amd_iommu.h. What would you prefer?
Thanks,
Suravee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 14:12 [PATCH V5 00/10] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 01/10] perf/amd/iommu: Misc fix up perf_iommu_read Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 02/10] perf/amd/iommu: Consolidate and move perf_event_amd_iommu header Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-12 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 5:26 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 13:37 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2016-03-14 14:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-14 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-15 0:39 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-15 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-15 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-15 10:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-18 7:07 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 9:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-18 9:09 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 9:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-18 10:06 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-18 11:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-03-18 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 03/10] perf/amd/iommu: Modify functions to query max banks and counters Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 04/10] perf/amd/iommu: Modify IOMMU API to allow specifying IOMMU index Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 05/10] perf/amd/iommu: Declare pr_fmt and remove unnecessary pr_debug Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 06/10] perf/amd/iommu: Clean up perf_iommu_enable_event Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 07/10] perf/amd/iommu: Clean up get_next_available_iommu_bnk_cntr Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 08/10] perf/amd/iommu: Rename struct perf_amd_iommu to perf_iommu Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 09/10] iommu/amd: Introduce amd_iommu_get_num_iommus() Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-23 14:12 ` [PATCH V5 10/10] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-02-25 14:54 ` [PATCH V5 00/10] perf/amd/iommu: Enable multi-IOMMU support Joerg Roedel
2016-03-07 1:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E6BE7E.8010807@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andihartmann@freenet.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vw@iommu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome