From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Fix MACRO for commonly declared MFD cell attributes
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:52:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E925DC.6000505@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160316084219.GV13692@x1>
On Wednesday 16 March 2016 02:12 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> On Friday 11 March 2016 02:09 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, 09 Mar 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 02 March 2016 06:38 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday 26 February 2016 10:05 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>>>>>>> Did you not see warnings like this when you compiled the kernel? Did you
>>>>>>> find a different approach than what I proposed above to deal with it?
>>>>>>> I'd like to get this in soon so that when the max77620 drivers are all
>>>>>>> in and using it, it should be functional.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the following change also crash in runtime:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /***
>>>>>> commit e60a946f05db2cac857025da6ffb72df48d3be54
>>>>>> Author: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mfd: ab8500: Provide a small example using new MFD cell MACROs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should we have something MFD_CELL_RES, MFD_CELL_RES_PDATA,
>>>>>> MFD_CELL_PDATA, for more common user and not to pass the NULL here.
>>>>> I'll have a re-think about this.
>>>> Did you get chance to look into this? Probably, I need to send my
>>>> mfd series once this get fixed before that series applied.
>>> Nothing is going to happen until v4.6 now. It's too late in the
>>> release cycle to be making such a significant addition, and I'd like
>>> the change to sit in -next for a good while before going in.
>>>
>> OK, so can I use the local initializations in my max77620 patches
>> and resend?
>> Then later we can have cleanups for part only?
>>
>> This is because if we get in next release then there is some other
>> sub modules of the max77620 like clocks, watchdog, power etc which
>> can go on their subsystem if common header is available.
>>
>> Sorry if I am asking too much..
> For quick accptance, just submit using the normal un-MACRO'ed
> structure.
Thanks, I had sent V9 version of the MAX77620 which used normal
un-MACROed version.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-18 18:52 Rhyland Klein
2016-02-19 8:50 ` Lee Jones
2016-02-19 16:28 ` Rhyland Klein
2016-02-26 16:35 ` Rhyland Klein
2016-02-29 12:38 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02 13:08 ` Lee Jones
2016-03-09 13:22 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-11 8:39 ` Lee Jones
2016-03-11 8:57 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-16 8:42 ` Lee Jones
2016-03-16 9:22 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E925DC.6000505@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rklein@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome