mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline/rtmutex: Fix a PI crash for deadline tasks
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:23:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FE685E.6080001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160401113827.GQ3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 2016/04/01 at 19:38, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:00:18PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> I found a kernel crash while playing with deadline PI rtmutex.
>>
>>     BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018
>>     IP: [<ffffffff810eeb8f>] rt_mutex_get_top_task+0x1f/0x30
>>     PGD 232a75067 PUD 230947067 PMD 0
>>     Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>>     CPU: 1 PID: 10994 Comm: a.out Not tainted
>>
>>     Call Trace:
>>     [<ffffffff810cf8aa>] ? enqueue_task_dl+0x2a/0x320
>>     [<ffffffff810b658c>] enqueue_task+0x2c/0x80
>>     [<ffffffff810ba763>] activate_task+0x23/0x30
>>     [<ffffffff810d0ab5>] pull_dl_task+0x1d5/0x260
>>     [<ffffffff810d0be6>] pre_schedule_dl+0x16/0x20
>>     [<ffffffff8164e783>] __schedule+0xd3/0x900
>>     [<ffffffff8164efd9>] schedule+0x29/0x70
>>     [<ffffffff8165035b>] __rt_mutex_slowlock+0x4b/0xc0
>>     [<ffffffff81650501>] rt_mutex_slowlock+0xd1/0x190
>>     [<ffffffff810eeb33>] rt_mutex_timed_lock+0x53/0x60
>>     [<ffffffff810ecbfc>] futex_lock_pi.isra.18+0x28c/0x390
>>     [<ffffffff810cfa15>] ? enqueue_task_dl+0x195/0x320
>>     [<ffffffff810d0bac>] ? prio_changed_dl+0x6c/0x90
>>     [<ffffffff810ed8b0>] do_futex+0x190/0x5b0
>>     [<ffffffff810edd50>] SyS_futex+0x80/0x180
>>     [<ffffffff8165a089>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>     RIP  [<ffffffff810eeb8f>] rt_mutex_get_top_task+0x1f/0x30
>>
>> This is because rt_mutex_enqueue_pi() and rt_mutex_dequeue_pi()
>> are only protected by pi_lock when operating pi waiters, while
>> rt_mutex_get_top_task() will access them with rq lock held but
>> not holding pi_lock.
>>
>> It's hard for rt_mutex_get_top_task() to hold pi_lock, so the
>> patch ensures rt_mutex_enqueue_pi() and rt_mutex_dequeue_pi()
>> lock rq when operating "pi_waiters" and "pi_waiters_leftmost".
>> We need this iff lock owner has the deadline priority.
> How is this deadline specific, those functions you modify are
> deadline/rt agnostic.

I checked the code, currently only deadline accesses the pi_waiters/pi_waiters_leftmost
without pi_lock held via rt_mutex_get_top_task(), other cases all have pi_lock held.

So adding the condition.

Regards,
Xunlei

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-01 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-01 11:00 Xunlei Pang
2016-04-01 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01 12:23   ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2016-04-01 13:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01 13:34       ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-01 21:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-02 10:19           ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-05  8:38           ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-05  9:19             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-05  9:29               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-05 10:48                 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-05 11:32                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-08 16:25                 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-08 17:38                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-08 18:50                     ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-08 18:59                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-08 19:15                         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-08 19:28                           ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-09  3:27                             ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-09  3:25                         ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-09 13:29                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-10  8:22                             ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-12  3:08                               ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-12 15:51                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-13  2:13                                   ` Xunlei Pang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56FE685E.6080001@redhat.com \
    --to=xpang@redhat.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome