From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
JP Kobryn <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>, Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>, Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 23/26] fs,mm/fbatch: use invalidate_bh_lrus() not invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu()
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 03:30:51 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56a1dba3-1dd4-e4dd-a38b-3fdee74a690e@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e28f9a94-4339-f8ac-8301-6be3c9b5b7ce@google.com>
Whilst there can be a case for including an invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu() in
lru_add_drain_all()'s workqueued visits to remote CPUs, wouldn't it now
be a preferable cleanup to remove that alternative, and stick with the
smp_call_function_many_cond()-based invalidate_bh_lrus() throughout?
And fix the UP lru_add_drain_all() to include an invalidate_bh_lrus(),
which went missing when 5.15 commit 243418e3925d ("mm: fs: invalidate
bh_lrus for only cold path") took that out of lru_add_drain().
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
---
fs/buffer.c | 16 +---------------
include/linux/buffer_head.h | 4 ----
mm/folio.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index ed966fa73b1b..7d114e5b9c62 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ static void invalidate_bh_lru(void *arg)
put_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
}
-bool has_bh_in_lru(int cpu, void *dummy)
+static bool has_bh_in_lru(int cpu, void *dummy)
{
struct bh_lru *b = per_cpu_ptr(&bh_lrus, cpu);
int i;
@@ -1446,20 +1446,6 @@ void invalidate_bh_lrus(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(invalidate_bh_lrus);
-/*
- * It's called from workqueue context so we need a bh_lru_lock to close
- * the race with preemption/irq.
- */
-void invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu(void)
-{
- struct bh_lru *b;
-
- bh_lru_lock();
- b = this_cpu_ptr(&bh_lrus);
- __invalidate_bh_lrus(b);
- bh_lru_unlock();
-}
-
void folio_set_bh(struct buffer_head *bh, struct folio *folio,
unsigned long offset)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
index fd2c7115c054..f19f9e80be8f 100644
--- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
+++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
@@ -518,8 +518,6 @@ bool mmb_has_buffers(struct mapping_metadata_bhs *mmb);
void mmb_invalidate(struct mapping_metadata_bhs *mmb);
int mmb_sync(struct mapping_metadata_bhs *mmb);
void invalidate_bh_lrus(void);
-void invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu(void);
-bool has_bh_in_lru(int cpu, void *dummy);
extern int buffer_heads_over_limit;
#else /* CONFIG_BUFFER_HEAD */
@@ -528,8 +526,6 @@ static inline void buffer_init(void) {}
static inline bool try_to_free_buffers(struct folio *folio) { return true; }
static inline int mmb_sync(struct mapping_metadata_bhs *mmb) { return 0; }
static inline void invalidate_bh_lrus(void) {}
-static inline void invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu(void) {}
-static inline bool has_bh_in_lru(int cpu, void *dummy) { return false; }
#define buffer_heads_over_limit 0
#endif /* CONFIG_BUFFER_HEAD */
diff --git a/mm/folio.c b/mm/folio.c
index d66aa2469e86..dbad66e805e2 100644
--- a/mm/folio.c
+++ b/mm/folio.c
@@ -681,21 +681,6 @@ void lru_add_drain(void)
mlock_drain_local();
}
-/*
- * It's called from per-cpu workqueue context in SMP case so
- * lru_add_drain_cpu and invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu should run on
- * the same cpu. It shouldn't be a problem in !SMP case since
- * the core is only one and the locks will disable preemption.
- */
-static void lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain(void)
-{
- local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
- lru_add_drain_cpu(smp_processor_id());
- local_unlock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
- invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu();
- mlock_drain_local();
-}
-
void lru_add_drain_cpu_zone(struct zone *zone)
{
local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
@@ -711,7 +696,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, lru_add_drain_work);
static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
{
- lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain();
+ lru_add_drain();
}
static bool cpu_needs_drain(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -724,8 +709,7 @@ static bool cpu_needs_drain(unsigned int cpu)
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_move_tail) ||
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate_file) ||
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate) ||
- need_mlock_drain(cpu)) ||
- has_bh_in_lru(cpu, NULL);
+ need_mlock_drain(cpu));
}
/*
@@ -824,6 +808,8 @@ static inline void __lru_add_drain_all(bool force_all_cpus)
}
}
+ invalidate_bh_lrus();
+
for_each_cpu(cpu, &has_work)
flush_work(&per_cpu(lru_add_drain_work, cpu));
@@ -839,6 +825,7 @@ void lru_add_drain_all(void)
void lru_add_drain_all(void)
{
lru_add_drain();
+ invalidate_bh_lrus();
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -872,7 +859,7 @@ void lru_cache_disable(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
__lru_add_drain_all(true);
#else
- lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain();
+ lru_add_drain_all();
#endif
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 9:39 [PATCH v2 00/26] mm/fbatch: drain lru_add_drain() and _all() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/26] mm/fbatch: remove !CONFIG_SMP special case of folio_activate() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/26] mm/fbatch: allow folios_put_refs() to skip xa_is_value() entries Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/26] mm/fbatch: temporarily disable lazyfree and mlock+munlock batching Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/26] mm/fbatch: lru bit set, no extra ref, while folio on per-cpu fbatch Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 12:25 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/26] mm/fbatch: lru_add_del_folio()+folio_add_lru() after clear_lru() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 15:04 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-09 9:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/26] mm/fbatch: fbatch_drain_lazyfree(onstack fbatch) before ptl unlock Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 21:02 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-09 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/26] mm/fbatch: LRU_NEXT_ACTIVATE bit to optimize folio_activate() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-10 12:01 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-10 16:42 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/26] mm/fbatch: replace mlock_new_folio() by __folio_add_lru(,mlockit) Hugh Dickins
2026-09-10 17:47 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-09 9:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/26] mm/fbatch: restore mlock+munlock batching, without extra ref Hugh Dickins
2026-09-10 21:05 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-09 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/26] mm/fbatch: remove several uses of mlock_drain_local() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/26] mm/fbatch: remove migration's PAGE_WAS_MLOCKED lru_add_drain() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:05 ` [PATCH v2 12/26] mm/fbatch: remove percpu_pvec_drained and folios_put() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 13/26] mm/fbatch: no lru_add_drain to collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 14/26] mm/fbatch: no lru_add_drain() nor _all() for memfd_wait_for_pins() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 15/26] mm/fbatch: remove shake_folio() shake_page() from memory-failure Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 16/26] mm/fbatch: remove lru_cache_disable() from NUMA folio migration Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 17/26] mm/fbatch: no lru_cache_disable() in __alloc_contig_migrate_range() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 18/26] mm/fbatch: remove lru_add_drain() and _all() calls from various Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/26] mm/fbatch: vm/stat_refresh include lru_add_drain() on each cpu Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 20/26] s390/fbatch: no lru_add_drain_all() in s390_wiggle_split_folio() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 21/26] block/fbatch: no lru_add_drain_all() in invalidate_bdev() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:27 ` [PATCH v2 22/26] fs/fbatch: drop_caches invalidate_bh_lrus() not lru_add_drain_all() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:30 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2026-09-09 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 24/26] fs,mm/fbatch: lru_cache_disable() keep off buffer_head lrus only Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 25/26] mm/fbatch: move lru_add_drain_all() declaration to mm/internal.h Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 26/26] mm/fbatch: drop reference inside the loop when draining Hugh Dickins
2026-09-09 10:41 ` [PATCH v2 27/26] mm/fbatch: paranoid folio vmstats in folio_batch_move_lru() Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56a1dba3-1dd4-e4dd-a38b-3fdee74a690e@google.com \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jp.kobryn@linux.dev \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=leobras.c@gmail.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®