mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: Fix LED_OFF brightness race
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:15:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56f42c2e-94e9-4cb8-8046-2b9ef02995e0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z7br2g8Rc9Tkcsle@pilgrim>

Hi,

On 20-Feb-25 9:46 AM, Remi Pommarel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 12:52:36PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19-Feb-25 11:41 AM, Remi Pommarel wrote:
>>> While commit fa15d8c69238 ("leds: Fix set_brightness_delayed() race")
>>> successfully forces led_set_brightness() to be called with LED_OFF at
>>> least once when switching from blinking to LED on state so that
>>> hw-blinking can be disabled, another race remains. Indeed in
>>> led_set_brightness(LED_OFF) followed by led_set_brightness(any)
>>> scenario the following CPU scheduling can happen:
>>>
>>>     CPU0                                     CPU1
>>>     ----                                     ----
>>>  set_brightness_delayed() {
>>>    test_and_clear_bit(BRIGHTNESS_OFF)
>>>                                          led_set_brightness(LED_OFF) {
>>>                                            set_bit(BRIGHTNESS_OFF)
>>> 					   queue_work()
>>>                                          }
>>>                                          led_set_brightness(any) {
>>>                                            set_bit(BRIGHTNESS)
>>> 					   queue_work() //already queued
>>>                                          }
>>>    test_and_clear_bit(BRIGHTNESS)
>>>      /* LED set with brightness any */
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /* From previous CPU1 queue_work() */
>>>  set_brightness_delayed() {
>>>    test_and_clear_bit(BRIGHTNESS_OFF)
>>>      /* LED turned off */
>>>    test_and_clear_bit(BRIGHTNESS)
>>>      /* Clear from previous run, LED remains off */
>>>
>>> In that case the led_set_brightness(LED_OFF)/led_set_brightness(any)
>>> sequence will be effectively executed in reverse order and LED will
>>> remain off.
>>>
>>> With the introduction of commit 32360bf6a5d4 ("leds: Introduce ordered
>>> workqueue for LEDs events instead of system_wq") the race is easier to
>>> trigger as sysfs brightness configuration does not wait for
>>> set_brightness_delayed() work to finish (flush_work() removal).
>>>
>>> Use delayed_set_value to optionnally re-configure brightness after a
>>> LED_OFF. That way a LED state could be configured more that once but
>>> final state will always be as expected.
>>>
>>> Fixes: fa15d8c69238 ("leds: Fix set_brightness_delayed() race")
>>> Signed-off-by: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>
>>
>> Thanks, patch looks good to me:
>>
> 
> Actually two additionnal remarks here. The first one is that now more
> than before, delayed_set_value store should be seen before work_flags
> modification on other CPUs. That means that a smp_mb__before_atomic()
> is needed before the two set_bit().
> 
> The second one is that delayed_set_value can be bigger than a single
> byte, so theoretically store tearing can happen and
> set_brightness_delayed_set_brightness() could be called with an invalid
> value. WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE could prevent that but because the
> smp_mb__before_atomic() ensures that the "last" delayed_set_value is
> valid I don't mind having very seldom intermediate invalid values.
> 
> So I think a v2 with smp_mb__before_atomic() is needed here, what do you
> think ?

Doing a v2 with smp_mb__before_atomic() sounds good to me.

Regards,

Hans


      reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19 10:41 Remi Pommarel
2025-02-19 11:52 ` Hans de Goede
2025-02-20  8:46   ` Remi Pommarel
2025-02-20 10:15     ` Hans de Goede [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56f42c2e-94e9-4cb8-8046-2b9ef02995e0@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=repk@triplefau.lt \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®