mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: core: Resolve supply earlier
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:59:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570B8376.6030505@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460038959-21592-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com>

Hi Thierry,

On 07/04/16 15:22, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> Subsequent patches will need access to the parent supply from within the
> set_machine_constraints() function to properly implement bypass mode. If
> the parent supply hasn't been resolved by that time the voltage can't be
> queried.
> 
> Also, by making sure the supply is resolved early most of the changes in
> set_machine_constraints() don't have to be undone if resolution fails.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 2786d251b1cc..cc0333a79924 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -3972,18 +3972,27 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>  
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
>  
> +	if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
> +		rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
> +	else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
> +		rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * set_machine_constraints() needs the supply to be resolved in order
> +	 * to support querying the current voltage in bypass mode. Resolve it
> +	 * here to more easily handle deferred probing.
> +	 */
> +	ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto scrub;
> +

Thanks for sending this. However, I think that calling
regulator_resolve_supply() can cause a deadlock, because the
regulator_list_mutex is held at this point and
regulator_resolve_supply() calls regulator_dev_lookup() which may try to
request the mutex again.

So may be we need to move this call after the call to
regulator_of_get_init_data() before we acquire the mutex.

Also, if we add this call, then I am wondering if we still need ...

	class_for_each_device(&regulator_class, NULL, NULL,
			      regulator_register_resolve_supply);

Cheers
Jon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-11 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-07 14:22 Thierry Reding
2016-04-07 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator: core: Use parent voltage from the supply when bypassed Thierry Reding
2016-04-12  6:31   ` Applied "regulator: core: Use parent voltage from the supply when bypassed" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-07 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: helpers: Ensure bypass register field matches ON value Thierry Reding
2016-04-22 10:49   ` Applied "regulator: helpers: Ensure bypass register field matches ON value" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-07 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: as3722: Add bypass support for LDO6 Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 16:15   ` Applied "regulator: as3722: Add bypass support for LDO6" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-07 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: as3722: Constify regulator ops Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 16:15   ` Applied "regulator: as3722: Constify regulator ops" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-11 10:59 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2016-04-11 11:46   ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: core: Resolve supply earlier Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 12:19     ` Jon Hunter
2016-04-11 12:49       ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:03       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-11 12:58     ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 13:09       ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 13:45         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-11 13:57           ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:07             ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 14:32               ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:49                 ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 15:50                   ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 13:56         ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:11   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 14:16     ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 10:16       ` Jon Hunter
2016-04-19 11:03         ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-19 15:40         ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 16:09           ` Jon Hunter
2016-04-20 15:21             ` Mark Brown
2016-04-21 15:34               ` Jon Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570B8376.6030505@nvidia.com \
    --to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome