From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752651AbcDOQSJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:18:09 -0400 Received: from vern.gendns.com ([206.190.152.46]:60909 "EHLO vern.gendns.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752499AbcDOQSG (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:18:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: DTS: da850: add node for spi0 To: Sekhar Nori References: <1460586628-25152-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com> <1460586628-25152-2-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com> <5710C176.3040304@ti.com> Cc: Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Kevin Hilman , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Lechner Message-ID: <57111433.6080402@lechnology.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:17:55 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5710C176.3040304@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vern.gendns.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - lechnology.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vern.gendns.com: authenticated_id: davidmain+lechnology.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Authenticated-Sender: vern.gendns.com: davidmain@lechnology.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/15/2016 05:24 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > This made me notice that num-cs is populated wrongly for spi1. It > actually has 8 chip selects. This is fine though. I might as well fix it since I have to make changes anyway. Don't remember how I came up with 6. > > Also, it will be nice to add pinctrl entries for spi0 like it is done > for spi1. You will need those anyway for using the interface. I omitted this on purpose. For my use case, I am using the SPI as write-only, so not using the SOMI pin, which is actually muxed as a GPIO for something else. So having a pinctl like spi1 is of no use to me. I figured if someone needs it, they can add it, otherwise it just is wasted space to me. > > I prefer DT updates are patches of their own and not combined with code > updates like this. Can you please split this up? Ack.