From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751943AbcDRIw3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 04:52:29 -0400 Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([125.16.236.6]:60397 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751851AbcDRIw1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 04:52:27 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d28relay03.in.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <5714A040.9090903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:22:16 +0530 From: Anshuman Khandual User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org CC: hughd@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kirill@shutemov.name, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Enable HugeTLB page migration on POWER References: <1460007464-26726-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1460007464-26726-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable x-cbid: 16041808-0021-0000-0000-00000BA6B15A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/07/2016 11:07 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This patch series enables HugeTLB page migration on POWER platform. > This series has some core VM changes (patch 1, 2, 3) and some powerpc > specific changes (patch 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Comments, suggestions > and inputs are welcome. > > Anshuman Khandual (10): > mm/mmap: Replace SHM_HUGE_MASK with MAP_HUGE_MASK inside mmap_pgoff > mm/hugetlb: Add PGD based implementation awareness > mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions from race Hugh/Mel/Naoya/Andrew, Andrew had already reviewed the changes in the first two patches during the RFC phase and was okay with them. Could you please review the third patch here as well and let me know your inputs/suggestions. Currently the third patch has got build failures on SPARC and S390 platforms (details of which are on the thread with possible fixes). Thank you.