mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>, linus.walleij@linaro.org
Cc: gnurou@gmail.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: tegra: Remove the need of keeping device handle for gpio driver
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:58:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57165592.50706@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571512B0.90303@nvidia.com>

On 04/18/2016 11:00 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Monday 18 April 2016 09:59 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 02:46 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> Remove the file static device handle variable as this is just
>>> required for prints. The required handle can be stored in
>>> tegra_gpio_chip and hence it become redundancy.
>>
>> This seems fine as far as it goes, but if it's worth doing this,
>> please move all the globals into the GPIO chip rather than just one of
>> the 7 globals.
>
> the device pointer is part of the gpiochip and so it is better to use
> gpiochip parent member instead of locally duplicating.
>
> However, moving to other global variables needs some major changes and I
> think it should be treated as independent of this patch.
> This patch just utilizes the gpiochip.parent here.

Looking at the patch this just trades using one global (dev) for another 
(tegra_gpio_chip), so when the other globals are removed, you'll need to 
go back and change tegra_gpio_irq_set_type() again to remove use of the 
global tegra_gpio_chip.

Still, this /does/ remove one global so I guess it's OK. I don't feel 
terribly strongly, especially if you're going to send more patches soon 
to remove the other globals. I'll leave the call to Linus.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-19 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-18  8:46 [PATCH 1/3] gpio: tegra: Don't open code of_device_get_match_data() Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-18  8:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] gpio: tegra: Remove the need of keeping device handle for gpio driver Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-18 16:29   ` Stephen Warren
2016-04-18 17:00     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 15:58       ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2016-04-20  1:16   ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-04-18  8:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-18 16:38   ` Stephen Warren
2016-04-18 17:06     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 16:01       ` Stephen Warren
2016-04-18 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] gpio: tegra: Don't open code of_device_get_match_data() Stephen Warren
2016-04-20  0:56 ` Alexandre Courbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57165592.50706@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome