From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
"Greg Ungerer" <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] m68k: Avoid CONFIG_COLDFIRE switch in uapi header
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:19:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571ed28a-9690-4f85-9122-4b0f76975cb3@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231110103120.387517-1-thuth@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023, at 11:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We should not use any CONFIG switches in uapi headers since
> these only work during kernel compilation. They are not defined
> for userspace. Let's use the __mcoldfire__ switch from the
> compiler here instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> Marked as RFC since I didn't test it - I'd appreciate if someone
> could give it a try on a real system.
>
> arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 2 +-
> scripts/headers_install.sh | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> b/arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> index 5b50ea592e00..ebd9fccb3d11 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct pt_regs {
> long d0;
> long orig_d0;
> long stkadj;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_COLDFIRE
> +#ifdef __mcoldfire__
> unsigned format : 4; /* frame format specifier */
> unsigned vector : 12; /* vector offset */
> unsigned short sr;
I think this should be harmless, but I'm not sure we even
need the structure in a uapi header: about half the architectures
define this in a user-visible way, while the others don't.
On csky, powerpc and microblaze, pt_regs is used inside
of the 'struct sigcontext' definition, but I don't think
this was ever the case on m68k.
The other one that is accessed in userspace is 'struct
user_regs_struct', but this one is actually not in the
uapi headers on m68k or x86.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-10 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-10 10:31 Thomas Huth
2023-11-10 11:19 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2023-11-14 14:20 ` Greg Ungerer
2023-11-14 14:32 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571ed28a-9690-4f85-9122-4b0f76975cb3@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®