mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	"Greg Ungerer" <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] m68k: Avoid CONFIG_COLDFIRE switch in uapi header
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:19:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571ed28a-9690-4f85-9122-4b0f76975cb3@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231110103120.387517-1-thuth@redhat.com>

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023, at 11:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We should not use any CONFIG switches in uapi headers since
> these only work during kernel compilation. They are not defined
> for userspace. Let's use the __mcoldfire__ switch from the
> compiler here instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  Marked as RFC since I didn't test it - I'd appreciate if someone
>  could give it a try on a real system.
>
>  arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 2 +-
>  scripts/headers_install.sh          | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h 
> b/arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> index 5b50ea592e00..ebd9fccb3d11 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct pt_regs {
>    long     d0;
>    long     orig_d0;
>    long     stkadj;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_COLDFIRE
> +#ifdef __mcoldfire__
>    unsigned format :  4; /* frame format specifier */
>    unsigned vector : 12; /* vector offset */
>    unsigned short sr;

I think this should be harmless, but I'm not sure we even
need the structure in a uapi header: about half the architectures
define this in a user-visible way, while the others don't.

On csky, powerpc and microblaze, pt_regs is used inside
of the 'struct sigcontext' definition, but I don't think
this was ever the case on m68k.

The other one that is accessed in userspace is 'struct
user_regs_struct', but this one is actually not in the
uapi headers on m68k or x86.

     Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-10 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-10 10:31 Thomas Huth
2023-11-10 11:19 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2023-11-14 14:20   ` Greg Ungerer
2023-11-14 14:32     ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=571ed28a-9690-4f85-9122-4b0f76975cb3@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®