From: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
To: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"chasemetzger15@gmail.com" <chasemetzger15@gmail.com>,
"balbi@ti.com" <balbi@ti.com>,
"kborer@gmail.com" <kborer@gmail.com>,
"mjg59@coreos.com" <mjg59@coreos.com>,
"jun.li@freescale.com" <jun.li@freescale.com>,
"Robert.Schlabbach@gmx.net" <Robert.Schlabbach@gmx.net>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"joe.lawrence@stratus.com" <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: fix panic caused by NULL bos pointer during reset device
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:35:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5720C03D.5080403@cybernetics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0C18FE92A7765D4EB9EE5D38D86A563A05D1D704@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 04/26/2016 10:53 PM, Du, Changbin wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:15:17PM +0800, changbin.du@intel.com wrote:
>>> From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
>>>
>>> This is a reworked patch based on reverted commit d8f00cd685f5 ("usb:
>>> hub: do not clear BOS field during reset device").
>>>
>>> The privious one caused double mem-free if run to re_enumerate label.
>>> New patch title changed to distinguish from old one. And I have tested
>>> it with memory debugging options.
>>>
>>> In function usb_reset_and_verify_device, the old BOS descriptor may
>>> still be used before allocating a new one. (usb_disable_lpm function
>>> uses it under the situation that it fails at usb_disable_link_state.)
>>> So we cannot set the udev->bos to NULL before that, just keep what it
>>> was. It will be overwrite when allocating a new one.
>>>
>>> How to reproduce:
>>> 1. connect one usb3 hub to xhci port.
>>> 2. connect several lpm-capable super-speed usb disk to the hub.
>>> 3. copy big files to the usb disks.
>>> 4. disconnect the hub and repeat step 1-4.
>>>
>>> Crash log:
>>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>>> 0000000000000010
>>> IP: [<ffffffff8171f98d>] usb_enable_link_state+0x2d/0x2f0
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<ffffffff8171ed5b>] ? usb_set_lpm_timeout+0x12b/0x140
>>> [<ffffffff8171fcd1>] usb_enable_lpm+0x81/0xa0
>>> [<ffffffff8171fdd8>] usb_disable_lpm+0xa8/0xc0
>>> [<ffffffff8171fe1c>] usb_unlocked_disable_lpm+0x2c/0x50
>>> [<ffffffff81723933>] usb_reset_and_verify_device+0xc3/0x710
>>> [<ffffffff8172c4ed>] ? usb_sg_wait+0x13d/0x190
>>> [<ffffffff81724743>] usb_reset_device+0x133/0x280
>>> [<ffffffff8179ccd1>] usb_stor_port_reset+0x61/0x70
>>> [<ffffffff8179cd68>] usb_stor_invoke_transport+0x88/0x520
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Du, Changbin <changbin.du@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> Is this patch still needed? I thought we had some other fix in this
>> area...
>>
>> confused,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
> Hi, Greg k-h,
> Sorry for it confused you. This patch still need. This is same fix with
> previous commit d8f00cd685f5 ("usb: hub: do not clear BOS field
> during reset device"). But d8f00cd685f5 is buggy and reverted. This
> new patch should be the final fix.
>
> Best Regards,
> Du, Changbin
>
I think Greg is referring to commit 464ad8c43a9e ("usb: core : hub: Fix
BOS 'NULL pointer' kernel panic"), which has already been applied
upstream. It looks to me like that patch might have fixed the same
problem in a different way, in which case Changbin's patch is not
needed. But I haven't been involved in developing or testing that
patch, so I can't say for sure. At the very least, 464ad8c43a9e
conflicts with Changbin's patch.
Changbin, can you take a look at 464ad8c43a9e and see if that fixes the
same problem that your patch did?
Thanks,
Tony Battersby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 9:15 changbin.du
2016-04-26 22:16 ` Greg KH
2016-04-27 2:53 ` Du, Changbin
2016-04-27 13:35 ` Tony Battersby [this message]
2016-05-03 21:18 ` Greg KH
2016-05-04 2:21 ` Du, Changbin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5720C03D.5080403@cybernetics.com \
--to=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
--cc=Robert.Schlabbach@gmx.net \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=chasemetzger15@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=jun.li@freescale.com \
--cc=kborer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@coreos.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome