From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752426AbcEKTRP (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 15:17:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:33074 "EHLO mail-pf0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751413AbcEKTRN (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 15:17:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] TLB/XPA fixes & cleanups To: Ralf Baechle References: <1460716620-13382-1-git-send-email-paul.burton@imgtec.com> <20160510124426.GG16402@linux-mips.org> <57321EC4.5030301@gmail.com> <20160511100335.GA14397@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, James Hogan , Adam Buchbinder , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Joshua Kinard , Huacai Chen , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Paul Gortmaker , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , David Daney , Jonas Gorski , Markos Chandras , Ingo Molnar , Alex Smith , "Kirill A. Shutemov" From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: <57338536.9040209@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 12:17:10 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160511100335.GA14397@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/11/2016 03:03 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:47:48AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> Applied - but "MIPS: Separate XPA CPU feature into LPA and MVH" causes >>> a massive conflict with Florian's RIXI patches >>> >>> [3/6] MIPS: Allow RIXI to be used on non-R2 or R6 core >>> [4/6] MIPS: Move RIXI exception enabling after vendor-specific cpu_probe >>> [5/6] MIPS: BMIPS: BMIPS4380 and BMIPS5000 support RIXI >>> >>> I figured unapplying those three, applying Paul's series then re-applying >>> Florian's patch on top of the whole series will be the easier path as in >>> leaving me with the smaller rejects to manage. >> >> Did you already push that to mips-for-linux-next? I can give it a quick >> spin once you do so. > > I just pushed a tree with everything applied. HEAD of tree is > 22702a86997c5aed2e479bfe0b24d10d66b09604 dated May 11 11:58:06; a version > from earlier today was broken. Boot tested on BMIPS5000 (BCM7425): Tested-by: Florian Fainelli Thanks! -- Florian