From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
Randy Wright <rwright@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/hpet: Reduce HPET counter read contention
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 19:20:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57350FBF.9060807@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460486768-34024-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
On 04/12/2016 02:46 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On a large system with many CPUs, using HPET as the clock source can
> have a significant impact on the overall system performance because
> of the following reasons:
> 1) There is a single HPET counter shared by all the CPUs.
> 2) HPET counter reading is a very slow operation.
>
> Using HPET as the default clock source may happen when, for example,
> the TSC clock calibration exceeds the allowable tolerance. Something
> the performance slowdown can be so severe that the system may crash
> because of a NMI watchdog soft lockup, for example.
>
> This patch attempts to reduce HPET read contention by using the fact
> that if more than one CPUs are trying to access HPET at the same time,
> it will be more efficient if one CPU in the group reads the HPET
> counter and shares it with the rest of the group instead of each
> group member reads the HPET counter individually.
>
> This is done by using a combination word with a sequence number and
> a bit lock. The CPU that gets the bit lock will be responsible for
> reading the HPET counter and update the sequence number. The others
> will monitor the change in sequence number and grab the HPET counter
> accordingly. This change is enabled on SMP configuration.
>
> On a 4-socket Haswell-EX box with 72 cores (HT off), running the
> AIM7 compute workload (1500 users) on a 4.6-rc1 kernel (HZ=1000)
> with and without the patch has the following performance numbers
> (with HPET or TSC as clock source):
>
> TSC = 646515 jobs/min
> HPET w/o patch = 566708 jobs/min
> HPET with patch = 638791 jobs/min
>
> The perf profile showed a reduction of the %CPU time consumed by
> read_hpet from 4.99% without patch to 1.41% with patch.
>
> On a 16-socket IvyBridge-EX system with 240 cores (HT on), on the
> other hand, the performance numbers of the same benchmark were:
>
> TSC = 3145329 jobs/min
> HPET w/o patch = 1108537 jobs/min
> HPET with patch = 3019934 jobs/min
>
> The corresponding perf profile showed a drop of CPU consumption of
> the read_hpet function from more than 34% to just 2.96%.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
> ---
> v3->v4:
> - Move hpet_save inside the CONFIG_SMP block to fix a compilation
> warning in non-SMP build.
>
> v2->v3:
> - Make the hpet optimization the default for SMP configuration. So
> no documentation change is needed.
> - Remove threshold checking code as it should not be necessary and
> can be potentially unsafe.
>
> v1->v2:
> - Reduce the CPU threshold to 32.
> - Add a kernel parameter to explicitly enable or disable hpet
> optimization.
> - Change hpet_save.hpet type to u32 to make sure that read& write
> is atomic on i386.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
I haven't received any feedback on this patch since mid-April. I would
like to know if the current patch is good enough or some additional
changes are still needed to make it merge-able upstream.
Thanks,
Longman
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-12 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-12 18:46 Waiman Long
2016-04-13 6:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 15:37 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-14 0:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-14 2:10 ` Waiman Long
2016-05-12 23:20 ` Waiman Long [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57350FBF.9060807@hpe.com \
--to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rwright@hpe.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome