From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753880AbcESHxH (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2016 03:53:07 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:54076 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbcESHxF (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2016 03:53:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: pwm-beeper - fix: scheduling while atomic To: Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <56C4735E.6020300@gmx.at> <20160222194639.GD26177@dtor-ws> <20160512121852.GB26824@ulmo.ba.sec> <5735F4E3.20008@gmx.at> <573C8761.9070601@gmx.at> <20160518160601.GB5407@kroah.com> Cc: Thierry Reding , Dmitry Torokhov , Manfred Schlaegl , Luis de Bethencourt , Olivier Sobrie , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Manfred Schlaegl X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <573D70D5.7070401@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 09:52:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160518160601.GB5407@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Zvn8z5l+yBTopZIm/PSa3lH035MipzXS54y2cZzvWfl1szW5pnH pP6guM7BkJOsQ4wUTkBeHRISCGLTmXk1q0BWmOjAJy6rysTGfxrMTHOrJiaEMBKm/PtDW6T nsQk7qtERSc0maBIleUH15x995EGWpfwVlYYwL75vsj/p0rWgxpi62NqQ9S2vUXURHaqAqn 7Gz6nt3bj27zVtJZH8jVw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:rCi7b+6Xp/c=:+XHjaH/oY0uEylLTeS8L8v krRFzvoi2cDXrxYMeHNvhZwTiafIjVOJVAfbk44iZ14dFduI+1VxSta21z3M2cRFwgvm4plXw SjEciK4eAnPXBBes7F4cZ11cd5pCB3mInVqQsZK9eyrCwQXYsPFACRwotU1lAlhSdHCa7NwHy oOd198Wth/6Beyh8i7pkle7VO5vBu+LF0CO9z29W8Gbgv6IBe+b2z+gV0rzFJQ2iJ0WoXzlhI IgmiF3sYR9pha0XZndKbYM1DI8z1dqgdQ8I83Vnbr8zCzJnARCTZU3XEL5ocltz0jJLr42065 1hAl33BOP7/KIGeJUqdclBQBahRJMGhC3SiK5/0t9hGxMc1tWa98CDKzXEb5IS0OFmj9W0soD bNTCsNRrK3pekPe1ZlaJrj/IRZ2l1htLuhPIyE+FFrU3+z/iN3xX8iepbPBEYTbbZ1XuveMMm o5QDV6wZzV2L2rV2vHV28JJkEQ6N/p+l72PzmQgbDAXla2nafBxQw5FlwvAe156xeHP4aw2HJ YPxT4T1iMkdci7k9J1rQMylnKjpKbUHPzoXUlF0Ff8ocNDZj/cuLIHg3dPFKVmshwrNEXb6LN 4rJl7zF8M7ogSDwhJ1awcn4uwKxinSgjNQHZ9NklHI02LRA5/5CiUcvfCMs95OBy2J9gy36HF YGXcl4xeQSgpOb9gJqU7yUNu3Tfc+zSv9+ZKYJdEHb42u0H97DNt988ypcFN91SKZFEf+puNy ngtNmWYPxftjFma5pa6jblEpOhjXLEkphmEadL0kT9m+JQcRjjhrMgZLDU8w3vbeUYsgJH/nW dZu8p8o Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016-05-18 18:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:16:49PM +0200, Manfred Schlaegl wrote: >> Pwm config may sleep so defer it using a worker. >> >> Trigger: >> On a Freescale i.MX53 based board we ran into "BUG: scheduling while >> atomic" because input_inject_event locks interrupts, but >> imx_pwm_config_v2 sleeps. >> >> Tested on Freescale i.MX53 SoC with 4.6.0 and 4.1.24. >> >> Unmodified applicable to >> * 4.6 (stable) >> * 4.5.4 (stable) >> * 4.4.10 (longterm) >> * 4.1.24 (longterm) >> >> Modified applicable to >> * 3.18.33 (longterm) > > What does this all mean? Have you read > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to mark things for stable > inclusion? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Sorry, I'm afraid I missed that. Thanks for the clarification. I will respect that in the future. Should I resend the patch with a cleaned up message (without "Unmodified applicable to" and "Modified applicable to" stuff)? Is the rest of message (formally) ok? thanks, manfred