From: "Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)" <Haibo.Xu@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
"jdike@addtoit.com" <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
"Bin Lu (Arm Technology China)" <Bin.Lu@arm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 01:03:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5750cfac-14a7-8eed-09f4-0d53419bea6b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312120944.GB13825@e107155-lin>
On 2019/3/12 20:09, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:04:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 6:35 PM Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
>> <Haibo.Xu@arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>
> [...]
>
>>> For the PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP request, ptrace only need to report(send
>>> SIGTRAP) at the entry of a system call, no need to report at the exit of a
>>> system call.That's why the old logic-{step = ((flags & (_TIF_SINGLESTEP |
>>> _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) == _TIF_SINGLESTEP)} here try to filter out the special
>>> case(PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP).
>>>
>>> Another way to make sure the logic is fine, you can run some tests with
>>> respect to both logic, and to check whether they have the same behavior.
>>
>> tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c has a test intended to
>> exercise this. Can one of you either confirm that it does exercise it
>> and that it still passes or can you improve the test?
>>
> I did run the tests which didn't flag anything. I haven't looked at the
> details of test implementation, but seem to miss this case. I will see
> what can be improved(if it's possible). Also I think single_step_syscall
> is the one I need to look for this particular one. Both single_step_syscall
> ptrace_syscall reported no errors.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
Since ptrace() system call do have so many request type, I'm not sure whether the
test cases have covered all of that. But here we'd better make sure the PTRACE_SYSEMU
and PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP requests are work correctly. May be you can verify them with
tests from Bin Lu(bin.lu@arm.com).
Regards,
Haibo
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-13 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 18:32 [PATCH 0/6] ptrace: consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add support for arm64 Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] ptrace: move clearing of TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag to core Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] ptrace: introduce ptrace_syscall_enter to consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 8:03 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 12:23 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-04 12:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook Sudeep Holla
2019-03-03 1:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-04 10:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 8:25 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 2:14 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-11 18:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-12 1:34 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-12 3:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-12 12:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-13 1:03 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China) [this message]
2019-03-14 10:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-15 5:48 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-12 12:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: use common ptrace_syscall_enter hook to handle _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 9:36 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: add PTRACE_SYSEMU{,SINGLESTEP} definations to uapi headers Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5750cfac-14a7-8eed-09f4-0d53419bea6b@arm.com \
--to=haibo.xu@arm.com \
--cc=Bin.Lu@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®