mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@samsung.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
	Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: usbip: fix null pointer dereference
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:20:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57553255.2050505@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5754675B.1050104@gmail.com>



On 06/05/2016 07:54 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2016 09:29 AM, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/02/2016 03:22 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> We have been dereferencing udc before checking it. Lets use it after it
>>> has been checked.
>>>
>>
>> To be honest I have mixed feelings about this patch.
>>
>> On one hand it prevents us from dereferencing potential NULL ptr what is
>> generally good. But on the other hand it seems to be a little bit
>> pointless overhead. This function is called only in one place, it's
>> internal function of vudc driver and in addition generally it is
>> currently impossible that this function will get NULL ptr as parameter
>> as it's value is taken from container_of(). Not to mention that if this
>> is NULL or garbage we will end up in NULL ptr dereference much earlier
>> before calling this function.
>>
>> So if there is something that you would like to fix with this patch and
>> you have a real problem with this function could you please provide us
>> some more details (for example stack trace)? If this patch is just to
>> prevent us from something that will never happen then I would rather to
>> not submit this. In my opinion if we get a NULL in this function this
>> means that we have some serious problem in UDC core and this check will
>> just mask this error.
> 
> Yes, I should have seen earlier that the only caller has already
> dereferenced udc. So maybe the following will be appropriate in this
> situation.
>

Your patch does exactly what Alan suggested and I agree with it;)

Could you please resend this properly so Greg can easily pick it up?

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Opasiak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-06  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-02 13:22 Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-03  8:29 ` Krzysztof Opasiak
2016-06-03 14:21   ` Alan Stern
2016-06-05 17:54   ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-06  8:20     ` Krzysztof Opasiak [this message]
2016-06-06  8:47       ` Sudip Mukherjee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57553255.2050505@samsung.com \
    --to=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome