On 06/12/16 21:22, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:01:38PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap >> >> kconfig tools generate the following warning when CONFIG_ACPI is not >> enabled: >> >> warning: (SND_SOC_INTEL_BYTCR_RT5640_MACH && SND_SOC_INTEL_BYTCR_RT5651_MACH && SND_SOC_INTEL_CHT_BSW_RT5672_MACH && SND_SOC_INTEL_CHT_BSW_RT5645_MACH && SND_SOC_INTEL_CHT_BSW_MAX98090_TI_MACH) selects SND_SST_IPC_ACPI which has unmet direct dependencies (SOUND && !M68K && !UML && SND && SND_SOC && ACPI) >> >> causing these build errors: >> >> In file included from ../sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c:40:0: >> ../include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:65:20: error: conflicting types for 'acpi_evaluate_dsm' >> union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const u8 *uuid, >> In file included from ../sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c:31:0: >> ../include/linux/acpi.h:676:34: note: previous definition of 'acpi_evaluate_dsm' was here >> static inline union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, >> >> I am told that ACPI is a requirement for these drivers, so make that >> explicit. Also end help text sentences with a period. >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap >> Cc: Jie Yang >> Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart >> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org >> --- >> sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 12 ++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> Should SND_SOC_INTEL_SST and possibly other similar drivers get this >> same change? > > The SND_SST_IPC_ACPI has depends on ACPI. > > Can you send me your config for this. Attached. -- ~Randy