mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gokul Praveen <g-praveen@ti.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael V. Volkmer" <rafael.v.volkmer@gmail.com>,
	<j-keerthy@ti.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, <n-francis@ti.com>,
	<u-kumar1@ti.com>, Gokul Praveen <g-praveen@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: tiehrpwm: Enable EHRPWM controller before setting configuration
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 11:21:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575bfd8e-9246-4acf-ba76-8d5a84689643@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hjiyxkzimydqjrtte6r5kemfthwdmhtkysplsptm3npgwqiv4b@d6vlu2fhks37>

Hi Uwe,


On 08/01/26 23:40, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Gokul,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 12:10:35PM +0530, Gokul Praveen wrote:
>> On 08/01/26 01:17, Rafael V. Volkmer wrote:
>>> Thanks for CC'ing me on this thread.
>>>
>>> On 07/01/26 15:21, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>> adding Rafael to Cc: who sent a patch series for this driver that I
>>>> didn't come around to review yet. Given that neither he nor me noticed
>>>> the problem addressed in this patch I wonder if it applies to all
>>>> hardware variants.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I also didn't observe the issue described here in my testing: duty cycle and
>>> period changes always appeared to take effect as expected.
>>>
>>> My tests were done on an AM623 EVM.
>>>
>>> One possible explanation is that my test flow mostly exercised configuration
>>> while the PWM was already enabled/active, which could mask the effect of a
>>> put_sync/reset happening after configuration.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this is the reason why the configuration was taking effect for you ,
>> Rafael, as the PWM was already enabled when setting the configuration hence
>> masking the effect of a put_sync/reset happening after configuration.
> 
> Can you provide a list of commands that show the failure? That would
> result in less guessing for me. My plan is to reproduce the failure
> tomorrow to better understand it on my boneblack.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe

Sure Uwe. These are the commands I have tried for PWM signal generation:

cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0# echo 0 > export
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0# cd pwm0/
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo 10000000 > period
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo 3000000 > duty_cycle
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo "normal" > polarity
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo 1 > enable

Once these commands were executed, I measured the PWM signal using logic 
analyzer and the duty cycle was 100% even though we had set 30% duty 
cycle through the sysfs nodes.

However, with the below command sequence, the duty cycle was getting set 
properly

cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0# echo 0 > export
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0# cd pwm0/
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo 10000000 > period
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo 3000000 > duty_cycle
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo "normal" > polarity
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo 1 > enable
/sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm0# echo 3000000 > duty_cycle


PWM is working only if we re-update the duty cycle after enabling the 
module.

If we do not re-update the duty cycle after enabling the module then PWM 
signal line is being high(100 % duty) always.

Test Environment: TI J784S4 EVM board.

Best Regards
Gokul Praveen




  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-09  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-07  5:53 Gokul Praveen
2026-01-07  9:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-01-07 10:23   ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-07 19:47   ` Rafael V. Volkmer
2026-01-08  6:40     ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-08 18:10       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-01-09  5:51         ` Gokul Praveen [this message]
2026-01-09 22:53           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-01-12  5:51             ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-12  7:22               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-01-19 15:00                 ` Kumar, Udit
2026-01-19 21:33                   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-01-20  4:40                     ` Kumar, Udit
2026-01-20  5:53                       ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-20  8:23                         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-01-20  8:34                           ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-15 10:32             ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-15 17:17               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-01-16  8:41                 ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-16  9:10                   ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-19  2:55             ` Rafael V. Volkmer
2026-01-19  6:48               ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-15  5:20           ` Kumar, Udit
2026-01-15  6:14             ` Gokul Praveen
2026-01-15  7:46               ` Kumar, Udit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=575bfd8e-9246-4acf-ba76-8d5a84689643@ti.com \
    --to=g-praveen@ti.com \
    --cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=n-francis@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael.v.volkmer@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®