From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: KASAN vs vmapped stacks
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:57:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57836D8F.3020104@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWucrYp+yq8RHSDqf93xtg793duByirurzJbLRhrz=tcA@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/10/2016 03:47 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I found two nasty issues with virtually mapped stacks if KASAN is
> enabled. The first issue is a crash: the first non-init stack is
> allocated and accessed before KASAN initializes its zero shadow
> AFAICT, which means that we switch to that stack and then blow up when
> we start recursively faulting on failed accesses to the shadow.
>
KASAN initialized quite early, before any non-init task exists. The crash happens
because non-init task writes to write-protected zero shadow.
Currently KASAN doesn't allocate shadow memory for vmalloc addresses, we just map single
zero page and write protect it.
> The second issue is that, even if we survive (we initialize the zero
> shadow on time), KASAN will fail to protect hte stack.
>
> For now, I just disabled use of virtually mapped stacks if KASAN is
> on. Do you have any easy ideas to fix it?
>
Allocate shadow memory which backs vmalloc/vmap allocations is the only way to fix this.
I can do this, and post the patches soon enough.
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-10 12:47 Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 8:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-07-11 14:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 9:57 ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2016-07-11 10:29 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-07-11 14:10 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-07-13 9:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57836D8F.3020104@virtuozzo.com \
--to=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome