From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Qianchang Zhao <pioooooooooip@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Zhitong Liu <liuzhitong1993@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: llcp: avoid double release/put on LLCP_CLOSED in nfc_llcp_recv_disc()
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:34:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <579e05b2-4124-4883-ac97-f7ad294ba635@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251217014048.16889-1-pioooooooooip@gmail.com>
On 17/12/2025 02:40, Qianchang Zhao wrote:
> nfc_llcp_sock_get() takes a reference on the LLCP socket via sock_hold().
>
> In nfc_llcp_recv_disc(), when the socket is already in LLCP_CLOSED state, the
> code used to perform release_sock() and nfc_llcp_sock_put() in the CLOSED branch
> but then continued execution and later performed the same cleanup again on the
> common exit path. This results in refcount imbalance (double put) and unbalanced
> lock release.
You did not answer to my questions, so I repeat the same question I
already asked you. Don't ignore reviewer's feedback.
>
> Remove the redundant CLOSED-branch cleanup so that release_sock() and
> nfc_llcp_sock_put() are performed exactly once via the common exit path, while
> keeping the existing DM_DISC reply behavior.
>
> Reported-by: Qianchang Zhao <pioooooooooip@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Zhitong Liu <liuzhitong1993@gmail.com>
Drop both. You are the author, there are no reported-by credits for authors.
Missing Fixes tag.
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qianchang Zhao <pioooooooooip@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/nfc/llcp_core.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
> index beeb3b4d2..ed37604ed 100644
> --- a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
> +++ b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
> @@ -1177,11 +1177,6 @@ static void nfc_llcp_recv_disc(struct nfc_llcp_local *local,
>
> nfc_llcp_socket_purge(llcp_sock);
>
> - if (sk->sk_state == LLCP_CLOSED) {
> - release_sock(sk);
> - nfc_llcp_sock_put(llcp_sock);
So why now sending to closed socket is right?
> - }
> -
> if (sk->sk_state == LLCP_CONNECTED) {
> nfc_put_device(local->dev);
> sk->sk_state = LLCP_CLOSED;
Best regards,
Krzysztof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-17 1:40 Qianchang Zhao
2025-12-17 7:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=579e05b2-4124-4883-ac97-f7ad294ba635@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuzhitong1993@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pioooooooooip@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®