From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753303AbcIBU2D (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:28:03 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.11]:51698 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751845AbcIBU2B (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:28:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] Documentation: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol To: Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring References: <20160830130647.6828-1-nm@ti.com> <20160830130647.6828-2-nm@ti.com> <20160902150628.GA19493@rob-hp-laptop> CC: Tero Kristo , Lokesh Vutla , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Sudeep Holla , lkml , "Andrew F . Davis" , Russell King , Russ Dill , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Santosh Shilimkar , dt list From: Dave Gerlach Message-ID: <57C9E0A8.4010701@ti.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:27:20 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [128.247.83.19] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Rob, > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > [...] >>> + >>> +TI-SCI Client Device Node: >>> +======================== >>> + >>> +Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci" property. >> >> As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained >> (i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes. >> > > Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also > assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here. > > Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > -> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned. > > Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections? No objections, I think this is a logical move. Regards, Dave > > > --- > Regards, > Nishanth Menon >