mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lizefan@huawei.com>, <pi3orama@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tools include: Add uapi mman.h for each architecture
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:36:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57D91A36.5060505@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160914092810.GA21691@naverao1-tp.localdomain>



On 2016/9/14 17:28, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 2016/09/12 06:15PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:07:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>> Em Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:54:29PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>>>> Some mmap related macros have different values for different
>>>> architectures. This patch introduces uapi mman.h for each
>>>> architectures.
>>>>
>>>> Three headers are cloned from kernel include to tools/include:
>>>>
>>>>   tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
>>>>   tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h
>>>>   tools/include/uapi/linux/mman.h
>>> Cool, the above was done as copies, why not the rest? IIRC you mentioned
>>> some reasoning behind that decision, but we need it spelled out here.
>>>
>>> For instance, I went on and look at arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/mman.h,
>>> and couldn't find why we shouldn't copy it just like the three files
>>> above.
>>>
>>> I'm looking now at why the build breaks in so many systems, first hunch
>>> is that bits/ part (the ones without the failure details probably have
>>> the same errors), alpine uses musl libc, but some that broke are glibc
>>> based.
>> So, please take a look at my perf/core branch, I applied 1/3 and 3/3,
>> but took a different path for 2/3, now it builds for all systems I have
>> containers for:
> This still fails for me on ppc64. Perhaps we should guard
> P_MMAP_FLAG(32BIT) and potentially others with a #ifdef, which was
> earlier reverted by commit 256763b0 ("perf trace beauty mmap: Add more
> conditional defines")?

Perhaps we should set all non-exist flag to 0 in each uapi mman.h?

Thank you.

> - Naveen
>
> ---
> In file included from builtin-trace.c:560:0:
> trace/beauty/mmap.c: In function ‘syscall_arg__scnprintf_mmap_flags’:
> trace/beauty/mmap.c:38:14: error: ‘MAP_32BIT’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>    if (flags & MAP_##n) { \
>                ^
> trace/beauty/mmap.c:45:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘P_MMAP_FLAG’
>    P_MMAP_FLAG(32BIT);
>    ^
> trace/beauty/mmap.c:38:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    if (flags & MAP_##n) { \
>                ^
> trace/beauty/mmap.c:45:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘P_MMAP_FLAG’
>    P_MMAP_FLAG(32BIT);
>    ^
>    CC       bench/mem-functions.o
> mv: cannot stat ‘./.builtin-trace.o.tmp’: No such file or directory
> make[2]: *** [builtin-trace.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-14  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-12 12:54 [PATCH 0/3] perf: Fix mmap related macros Wang Nan
2016-09-12 12:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] tools include: Add uapi mman.h for each architecture Wang Nan
2016-09-12 19:07   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-12 21:15     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-13  6:36       ` Wangnan (F)
2016-09-14  9:28       ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-09-14  9:36         ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2016-09-14 10:00           ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-09-14 10:23             ` Wangnan (F)
2016-09-14 10:46               ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-09-14 10:49                 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-09-14 13:52         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-14 16:34           ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-09-14 17:00             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-15 14:47               ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-09-20 21:37   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2016-09-12 12:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] tools include: Introduce bits/mman.h Wang Nan
2016-09-12 12:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf build: Compare mman.h related headers againest kernel Wang Nan
2016-09-20 21:39   ` [tip:perf/core] perf build: Compare mman.h related headers against kernel originals tip-bot for Wang Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57D91A36.5060505@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome