From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG? genirq: irq 14 uses trigger mode 8; requested 0
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:24:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57b67069-8fc0-800f-b869-1eec3d64111f@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161101130231.GD1436@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Hi Mika,
On 01/11/16 13:02, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started seeing following messages on Intel Broxton when the
> pinctrl/GPIO driver [1] loads:
>
> [ 0.645786] genirq: irq 14 uses trigger mode 8; requested 0
>
> The driver shares interrupt with other GPIO "communities" or banks so it
> uses request_irq() instead of irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(). The
> driver does not specify IRQ flags as those come from ACPI resources.
>
> This started happen after commit 4b357daed698 ("genirq: Look-up trigger
> type if not specified by caller").
>
> I think this is what happens:
>
> 1. ACPI platform sets up the interrupt according what is in the _CRS
> of the GPIO device. This ends up setting trigger type for irq_data of
> the irq.
>
> 2. First GPIO device is found and the driver calls request_irq() which
> calls __setup_irq() where shared == 0.
>
> 3. Since new->flags is read back from irq_data we call __irq_set_trigger()
> passing the flags.
>
> 4. The parent IRQ chip, IO-APIC, does not have ->irq_set_type callback
> so __irq_set_trigger() never calls irq_settings_set_trigger_mask() for
> the desciptor.
>
> 5. The second GPIO device is found and this time shared == 1 so we
> end up comparing nmsk with omsk where nmsk was read from irq_data
> and omsk is read using irq_settings_get_trigger_mask().
>
> 6. Because we never called irq_settings_set_trigger_mask() for the
> descriptor, omsk is 0 and we print out a warning:
>
> [ 0.645786] genirq: irq 14 uses trigger mode 8; requested 0
>
> If I revert commit 4b357daed698 the warning goes away.
>
> Do you have any ideas how to get rid of the warning properly?
May be I am misunderstanding something here, but if the parent does not
have a ->irq_set_type callback, then it would seem that the type for the
interrupt should be not specified/set in the ACPI _CRS for the GPIO
device, right?
Thanks for the detailed description.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-01 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 13:02 Mika Westerberg
2016-11-01 14:24 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2016-11-01 14:44 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-11-07 11:49 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-11-07 13:32 ` Jon Hunter
2016-11-07 14:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-11-07 14:59 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-11-07 15:50 ` Jon Hunter
2016-11-07 16:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-07 19:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-08 9:17 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-11-08 14:22 ` [tip:irq/urgent] genirq: Use irq type from irqdata instead of irqdesc tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57b67069-8fc0-800f-b869-1eec3d64111f@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome