From: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>, "lee@kernel.org" <lee@kernel.org>,
"vadimp@nvidia.com" <vadimp@nvidia.com>,
"mpe@ellerman.id.au" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"npiggin@gmail.com" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"mazziesaccount@gmail.com" <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
"jic23@kernel.org" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"boqun.feng@gmail.com" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"kernel@salutedevices.com" <kernel@salutedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] devm-helpers: introduce devm_mutex_init
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:51:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57ea099a-8b88-4b16-9b54-b81e5b28bcb6@salutedevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34060476-86e5-42fb-a139-6790487c1568@csgroup.eu>
On 12/7/23 15:28, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 07/12/2023 à 13:02, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 1:23 AM George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/7/23 01:37, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> Le 06/12/2023 à 23:14, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> Looking at it closer, I have the feeling that you want to do similar to
>>>> devm_gpio_request() in linux/gpio.h :
>>>>
>>>> In linux/mutex.h, add a prototype for devm_mutex_init() when
>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is defined and an empty static inline otherwise.
>>>> Then define devm_mutex_init() in kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
>>>
>>> Yes, this would be almost perfect decision. BTW just as in linux/gpio.h
>>> we wouldn't have to include whole "linux/device.h" into mutex.h, only
>>> add forward declaration of struct device;
>>
>> In case you place it into a C-file. Otherwise you need a header for
>> the API and that is not acceptable for mutex.h.
>>
>
> Right, that's the reason why I'm suggesting to define devm_mutex_init()
> in kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c.
>
> In linux/mutex.h, you define a stub for when CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not
> set, and the prototype of devm_mutex_init() when CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is
> set.
Something like this:
diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index a33aa9eb9fc3..4a6041a7fd44 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
#include <linux/cleanup.h>
+struct device;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# define __DEP_MAP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
, .dep_map = { \
@@ -127,6 +129,20 @@ extern void __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const
char *name,
*/
extern bool mutex_is_locked(struct mutex *lock);
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
+
+extern int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock);
+
+#else
+
+static inline int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ mutex_init(lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
/*
* Preempt-RT variant based on rtmutexes.
@@ -169,6 +185,13 @@ do { \
\
__mutex_init((mutex), #mutex, &__key); \
} while (0)
+
+static inline int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ mutex_init(lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
/*
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
index bc8abb8549d2..d50dfa06e82c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
#include "mutex.h"
@@ -104,3 +105,25 @@ void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *lock)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_destroy);
+
+static void devm_mutex_release(void *res)
+{
+ mutex_destroy(res);
+}
+
+/**
+ * devm_mutex_init - Resource-managed mutex initialization
+ * @dev: Device which lifetime mutex is bound to
+ * @lock: Pointer to a mutex
+ *
+ * Initialize mutex which is automatically destroyed when the driver is
detached.
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
+ */
+int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ mutex_init(lock);
+ return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_mutex_release, lock);
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_mutex_init);
\ No newline at end of file
--
Best regards
George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 18:05 [PATCH v2 00/10] devm_led_classdev_register() usage problem George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] devm-helpers: introduce devm_mutex_init George Stark
2023-12-04 18:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-06 7:56 ` George Stark
2023-12-06 14:58 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-04 23:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-05 6:20 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-12-06 15:01 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-06 18:58 ` George Stark
2023-12-06 19:55 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-06 21:02 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-07 0:37 ` George Stark
2023-12-07 2:16 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-07 21:29 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-06 22:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 22:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 23:24 ` George Stark
2023-12-07 11:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-07 12:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-07 12:51 ` George Stark [this message]
2023-12-07 13:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-07 13:24 ` George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] leds: aw2013: unlock mutex before destroying it George Stark
2023-12-04 18:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 8:37 ` George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] leds: aw2013: use devm API to cleanup module's resources George Stark
2023-12-04 18:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] leds: aw200xx: " George Stark
2023-12-04 18:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:17 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] leds: lp3952: " George Stark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57ea099a-8b88-4b16-9b54-b81e5b28bcb6@salutedevices.com \
--to=gnstark@salutedevices.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@salutedevices.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vadimp@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®