From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com,
Liviu.Dudau@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:17:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5808458.pvV2iHpBWm@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1359976493.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Monday, February 04, 2013 05:08:50 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single governor_type. If we have
> a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per
> package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have
> multiple instances of ondemand governor for multiple packages.
>
> Governors directory in sysfs is created at /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/
> governor-name/. Which again reflects that there can be only one instance of a
> governor_type in the system.
>
> This is a bottleneck for multicluster system, where we want different packages
> to use same governor type, but with different tunables.
>
> This patchset is inclined towards fixing this issue.
>
> Viresh Kumar (4):
> cpufreq: Don't check cpu_online(policy->cpu)
> cpufreq: stats: Get rid of CPUFREQ_STATDEVICE_ATTR
> cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure
> cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
Well, [1-2/4] are things I can take for v3.9 no problem. The other two I'd
wait for the next cycle to be honest. We already have 30+ cpufreq patches
scheduled for v3.9 and some of them quite subtle for that matter.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 11:38 Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 11:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: Don't check cpu_online(policy->cpu) Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 11:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: stats: Get rid of CPUFREQ_STATDEVICE_ATTR Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 11:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 11:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors Viresh Kumar
2013-02-10 21:14 ` Francesco Lavra
2013-02-11 4:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-11 4:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 12:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-02-04 12:24 ` [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: " Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 12:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 13:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 13:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 13:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 13:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 14:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 14:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 15:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 15:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 16:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 7:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 9:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 9:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 10:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 11:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 11:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 11:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 11:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 12:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 13:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 13:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 9:36 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 11:29 ` Charles Garcia-Tobin
2013-02-05 11:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 18:38 ` Charles Garcia-Tobin
2013-02-05 18:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 16:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-06 9:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-06 10:08 ` Amit Kucheria
2013-02-06 10:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-06 10:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5808458.pvV2iHpBWm@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®