From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 21:52:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 21:52:28 -0400 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:41826 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 21:52:22 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Daniel Phillips cc: John Stoffel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 May 2001 11:24:54 +0200." <01052211245404.06233@starship> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:51:31 +1000 Message-ID: <5810.990582691@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 May 2001 11:24:54 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: >On Tuesday 22 May 2001 02:59, Keith Owens wrote: >> # Not a real dependency, this checks for hand editing of .config. >> $(KBUILD_OBJTREE)include/linux/autoconf.h: $(KBUILD_OBJTREE).config >> @echo Your .config is newer than include/linux/autoconf.h, >> this should not happen. @echo Always run make one of >> "{menu,old,x}config" after manually updating .config. @/bin/false > >Ahem. What is wrong with revalidating it automatically? *Then* if there's a >problem, bother the user. Revalidate using which tool? Did the user even mean to edit .config? This is a case where the user has to decide what to do.