mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND (again) PATCH] clkdev: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get()
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:02:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5824a382-00fc-0af3-097f-519a36c2d555@lechnology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180625160440.10537-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

On 06/25/2018 11:04 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> The way this function is implemented caused some confusion when
> converting the TI DaVinci platform to using the common clock framework.
> 
> Current kernel supports booting DaVinci boards both in device tree as
> well as legacy, board-file mode. In the latter, we always end up
> calling clk_get_sys() as of_node is NULL and __of_clk_get_by_name()
> returns -ENOENT.
> 
> It was not obvious at first glance how clk_get(dev, NULL) will work in
> board-file mode since we always call __of_clk_get_by_name(). Let's make
> it clearer by checking if of_node is NULL and skipping right to
> clk_get_sys().
> 
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
> Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-25 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-25 16:04 Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 23:02 ` David Lechner [this message]
2018-06-27 11:25   ` Sekhar Nori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5824a382-00fc-0af3-097f-519a36c2d555@lechnology.com \
    --to=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®