From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: xukuohai@huaweicloud.com,bpf@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,andrii@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,memxor@gmail.com,emil@etsalapatis.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,mason@kernel.org,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 05/16] libbpf: Add the arena percpu chunk attribute to map creation options
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:17:12 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <582d4780b89df462674ebf66e2eb1829cfe164209a095266966be9a0861ca47d@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e596c9878df94ac93c172d93106c8ebd2dac4bb7.1792503001.git.xukuohai@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3701 bytes --]
> libbpf: Add the arena percpu chunk attribute to map creation options
TL;DR: New fields inserted before log_opts in struct bpf_map_create_opts
appear to break libbpf ABI: binaries built against 1.8 may have log_opts
ignored or map creation fail with -EINVAL. They should likely be appended
after log_opts.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ struct bpf_map_create_opts {
> const void *excl_prog_hash;
> __u32 excl_prog_hash_size;
>
> + /* offset and size of an arena percpu chunk */
> + __u32 arena_percpu_chunk_off;
> + __u32 arena_percpu_chunk_sz;
> +
> struct bpf_log_opts *log_opts;
^^^^
Does inserting these two fields ahead of log_opts break the layout of
struct bpf_map_create_opts for existing users?
log_opts was added by 702259006f93 ("libbpf: Add syscall common attributes
support for map_create") and is already in a released libbpf (3ead4ead078f
("libbpf: Start v1.9 development cycle") says libbpf 1.8.0 has been
released, and 702259006f93 is an ancestor of it).
The OPTS_HAS(opts, field) scheme relies on the caller-supplied sz and
offsetofend(type, field), which only works if new fields are appended at the
end. On x86_64 the layout changes like this:
old (1.8): excl_prog_hash_size @64, log_opts @72, sizeof == 80
new: excl_prog_hash_size @64, arena_percpu_chunk_off @68,
arena_percpu_chunk_sz @72, log_opts @80, sizeof == 88
Consider an application built against the 1.8 headers that sets
opts.log_opts (opts.sz == 80), running against a shared libbpf that includes
this patch. In bpf_map_create():
attr.arena_percpu_chunk_off = OPTS_GET(opts, arena_percpu_chunk_off, 0);
/* 80 >= 72: reads old padding */
attr.arena_percpu_chunk_sz = OPTS_GET(opts, arena_percpu_chunk_sz, 0);
/* 80 >= 76: reads low 32 bits of the old log_opts pointer */
log_opts = OPTS_GET(opts, log_opts, NULL);
/* 80 < 88: NULL */
So the caller's log_opts is silently ignored, no log buffer is filled, and
true_size is never written back. The kernel also receives a non-zero
arena_percpu_chunk_sz.
On kernels without the arena percpu attr, BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD is still
excl_prog_hash_size in kernel/bpf/syscall.c at this commit, so
CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_CREATE) sees non-zero bytes past that field and returns
-EINVAL. Does that mean every map creation that passes log_opts, which used
to succeed, now fails?
On kernels with the later d7935093885b, an ARENA map would get a bogus chunk
size (rejected as unaligned, or accepted with a wrong layout), and other map
types would silently lose their log.
The reverse case also looks problematic. An application built with the new
header sets arena_percpu_chunk_sz but not log_opts, then runs against libbpf
1.8. The 1.8 library reads offset 72 (arena_percpu_chunk_sz plus padding) as
a struct bpf_log_opts pointer, and OPTS_VALID(log_opts, bpf_log_opts)
dereferences it.
Nothing later in this series (a6e6ab7a4b2f..08224ba2de19) touches
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h, so this is not fixed by a following patch.
Should the two new fields be appended after log_opts instead, with the
last-field marker updated?
struct bpf_log_opts *log_opts;
/* offset and size of an arena percpu chunk */
__u32 arena_percpu_chunk_off;
__u32 arena_percpu_chunk_sz;
size_t :0;
};
#define bpf_map_create_opts__last_field arena_percpu_chunk_sz
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/39434884362
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 13:22 [PATCH bpf-next 00/16] Add percpu variable support for bpf arena Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/16] libbpf: Collect arena percpu data section Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/16] libbpf: Create arena percpu chunk from the arena percpu ELF section Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/16] libbpf: Place the percpu chunks in the bpf arena Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/16] libbpf: Copy the percpu chunks into " Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/16] libbpf: Add the arena percpu chunk attribute to map creation options Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/16] libbpf: Relocate arena percpu access instructions Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/16] libbpf: Add arena percpu feature probe Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/16] bpf: Extend syscall to accept arena percpu information Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/16] bpf: Teach verifier about arena percpu instructions Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/16] bpf, x86: Add support for arena percpu Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/16] bpf, arm64: " Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/16] libbpf: Introduce arena percpu helpers for user space Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/16] bpftool: Emit the arena percpu datasec into skeleton Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 13:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/16] selftests/bpf: Add test for arena percpu-only object Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/16] selftests/bpf: Add test for mixed arena percpu object Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/16] selftests/bpf: Add test for arena percpu bounds Xu Kuohai
2026-10-20 14:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 14:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/16] Add percpu variable support for bpf arena Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-21 13:53 ` Xu Kuohai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=582d4780b89df462674ebf66e2eb1829cfe164209a095266966be9a0861ca47d@mail.kernel.org \
--to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®