From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753908AbeDYLUE (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:20:04 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:50656 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753378AbeDYLT5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:19:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] vfio: ccw: fix cleanup if cp_prefetch fails To: Dong Jia Shi , Cornelia Huck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, bjsdjshi@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, Halil Pasic References: <20180423110113.59385-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180423110113.59385-2-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180424113147.139e2e0b.cohuck@redhat.com> <20180425024341.GY12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Halil Pasic Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:19:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180425024341.GY12194@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18042511-0040-0000-0000-00000432B04C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18042511-0041-0000-0000-00002636E4EE Message-Id: <584f24d1-2dc1-4100-7919-3314b8142534@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-25_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804250108 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/25/2018 04:43 AM, Dong Jia Shi wrote: >> [Some procedural notes: I've created a new vfio-ccw-fixes branch based >> on the s390 fixes branch for easier handling. Things targeted for the >> next release will go on the vfio-ccw branch on top of the s390 features >> branch, as before. Does that work for everybody? > I don't see a reason that why it doesn't work for me. > Works for me. >> (And I am the only vfio-ccw maintainer with a kernel.org account, >> right?)] >> > I don't have such an account, and don't know if I need to apply for one. Neither do I have a kernel.org account -- at least for now. Regards, Halil