From: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Refresh CR0.WP prior to checking for emulated permission faults
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 20:31:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58a9410a-62f2-5a35-2ce3-f5203912465e@grsecurity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZC2HfNLa7sLewJtl@google.com>
On 05.04.23 16:36, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023, Mathias Krause wrote:
>> On 05.04.23 02:26, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> +void __kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> + struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
>>> +{
>>> + const bool cr0_wp = kvm_is_cr0_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR0_WP);
>>> +
>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON((KVM_MMU_CR0_ROLE_BITS & KVM_POSSIBLE_CR0_GUEST_BITS) != X86_CR0_WP);
>>
>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON((KVM_MMU_CR4_ROLE_BITS & KVM_POSSIBLE_CR4_GUEST_BITS));
>>
>> Just curious, this should assert that we don't run into similar issues
>> if we make more bits of CR4 guest owned?
>
> Yes? I'm not sure what you're asking. BUILD_BUG_ON() is a just more flexible
> version of stiatic_assert(); it only requires that the inputs be compile-time
> constants, not purely "static>
> he above throws an error at compile-time if there is new overlap between the
> CR{0,4} MMU role bits and the possible guest-owned bits. E.g. adding SMEP to the
> possible guest-owned CR4 bits yields:
Yes, I was just asking about the reasoning behind it as it, obviously,
isn't a problem with the current code. But I ran into it while doing
backports, so thanks for adding it :D
>
> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 0:26 Sean Christopherson
2023-04-05 12:38 ` Mathias Krause
2023-04-05 14:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-05 18:31 ` Mathias Krause [this message]
2023-04-10 23:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-10 23:30 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58a9410a-62f2-5a35-2ce3-f5203912465e@grsecurity.net \
--to=minipli@grsecurity.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®