From: "Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: "Sergei Shtylylov" <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove the obsolete IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 13:41:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58cb370e0604070441p5ea09c6fl5a778244db876f6e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060407003101.GF7118@stusta.de>
On 4/7/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:40:20PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On 3/27/06, Sergei Shtylylov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> >...
> > > > .flags = IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC,
> > >
> > > A late question: wasn't that IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC flag there for the same
> > > purpose -- to bypass enablebits check? Wasn't it enough?
> >
> > It was for the same purpose but it wasn't enough,
> > now this flag can die...
>
> IOW, we want the patch below?
Yes. Could you please add my ACK and forward it to akpm?
> > Bartlomiej
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
>
> <-- snip -->
>
>
> This patch removes the obsolete IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC.
>
> Noted by Sergei Shtylylov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c | 2 --
> drivers/ide/setup-pci.c | 13 -------------
> include/linux/ide.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/include/linux/ide.h.old 2006-04-07 00:51:49.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/include/linux/ide.h 2006-04-07 00:52:03.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1221,7 +1221,6 @@
> enum {
> /* Uses ISA control ports not PCI ones. */
> IDEPCI_FLAG_ISA_PORTS = (1 << 0),
> - IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC = (1 << 1),
> };
>
> typedef struct ide_pci_device_s {
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c.old 2006-04-07 00:52:13.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c 2006-04-07 00:52:19.000000000 +0200
> @@ -798,7 +798,6 @@
> .autodma = AUTODMA,
> .bootable = OFF_BOARD,
> .extra = 48,
> - .flags = IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC,
> },{ /* 2 */
> .name = "PDC20263",
> .init_setup = init_setup_pdc202ata4,
> @@ -819,7 +818,6 @@
> .autodma = AUTODMA,
> .bootable = OFF_BOARD,
> .extra = 48,
> - .flags = IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC,
> },{ /* 4 */
> .name = "PDC20267",
> .init_setup = init_setup_pdc202xx,
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/ide/setup-pci.c.old 2006-04-07 00:52:27.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/ide/setup-pci.c 2006-04-07 00:54:28.000000000 +0200
> @@ -580,7 +580,6 @@
> int port;
> int at_least_one_hwif_enabled = 0;
> ide_hwif_t *hwif, *mate = NULL;
> - static int secondpdc = 0;
> u8 tmp;
>
> index->all = 0xf0f0;
> @@ -592,21 +591,9 @@
> for (port = 0; port <= 1; ++port) {
> ide_pci_enablebit_t *e = &(d->enablebits[port]);
>
> - /*
> - * If this is a Promise FakeRaid controller,
> - * the 2nd controller will be marked as
> - * disabled while it is actually there and enabled
> - * by the bios for raid purposes.
> - * Skip the normal "is it enabled" test for those.
> - */
> - if ((d->flags & IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC) &&
> - (secondpdc++==1) && (port==1))
> - goto controller_ok;
> -
> if (e->reg && (pci_read_config_byte(dev, e->reg, &tmp) ||
> (tmp & e->mask) != e->val))
> continue; /* port not enabled */
> -controller_ok:
>
> if (d->channels <= port)
> break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-07 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-22 17:12 [2.6 patch] always enable CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE Adrian Bunk
2006-03-27 14:25 ` Sergei Shtylylov
2006-03-27 14:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2006-04-07 0:31 ` [2.6 patch] remove the obsolete IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC Adrian Bunk
2006-04-07 11:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2006-04-09 19:53 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58cb370e0604070441p5ea09c6fl5a778244db876f6e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®