mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyung Min Park <kyung.min.park@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	tony.luck@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	ricardo.neri@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/x86: Add documentation for /proc/cpuinfo feature flags
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:21:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58ec8ad4f6712fb8aa3db08e4a8d661d5531d7a0.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200830115024.GA4297@zn.tnic>

On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 13:50 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 03:30:32PM -0700, Kyung Min Park wrote:
> > Should I mention the tool specifically although the tool is WIP?
> 
> Well, if you wanna look at it that way, the whole kernel is
> constantly
> and forever WIP. :-)
> 
> Also, if there's some functionality missing, pointing to it might
> make
> people send patches.

That makes sense. :)

> > As you commented previously, should I use
> > tools/arch/x86/tools/cpuid/cpuid as the future tool and its
> > location?
> 
> Yeah, let's just drop the second "tools", i.e.,
> 
> tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/
> 
> or so should be good enough.
> 
> Thx.

Sure, I'll update in the next patch. Thank you for clarifying.


      reply	other threads:[~2020-08-30 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-24 18:04 Kyung Min Park
2020-08-28 18:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-28 22:30   ` Kyung Min Park
2020-08-30 11:50     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-30 21:21       ` Kyung Min Park [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58ec8ad4f6712fb8aa3db08e4a8d661d5531d7a0.camel@intel.com \
    --to=kyung.min.park@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®