mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>,
	"xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"naresh.kamboju@linaro.org" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	"aleksei.kodanev@bell-sw.com" <aleksei.kodanev@bell-sw.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/zram: Remove obsolete max_comp_streams interface
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:35:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <590c1f1c-2da1-583a-d055-83c15969cf80@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfD0hiUSf40jX82d@pevik>

On 1/26/22 12:13 AM, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>> on 2022/1/26 4:33, Shuah Khan wrote :
>>> On 12/15/21 2:56 AM, Yang Xu wrote:
>>>> Since kernel commit 43209ea2d17a ("zram: remove max_comp_streams
>>>> internals"), zram has
>>>> switched to per-cpu streams. Even kernel still keep this interface for
>>>> some reasons, but
>>>> writing to max_comp_stream doesn't take any effect. So remove it.
> 
>>> I get that max_comp_stream doesn't do anything since this referenced
>>> commit. Don't we need this test on older kernels since older kernels
>>> still support max_comp_stream?
> 
>> I read the following info from kernel selftest documentation
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kselftest.html
> 
>> "The kernel contains a set of “self tests” under the
>> tools/testing/selftests/ directory. These are intended to be small tests
>> to exercise individual code paths in the kernel. Tests are intended to
>> be run after building, installing and booting a kernel."
> 
>> So, we can build older kernel(use older kernel source) if we want to
>> test older kernel.
> 
>> IMO, kernel selftest is different from other testsuit(ie ltp, this
>> shuould think about api changes because ltp may test on different kernel).
> Yes, that's how I understand the difference with approach of in kselftest - the
> kernel tree testsuite and LTP - the out-of-tree testsuite.
> 

Removing max_comp_stream test appears to be motivated by the fact it isn't
needed on newer kernels.

Kselftest from mainline can be run on older stable kernels. This is a use-case
for a lot test rings. The idea is that when a new test gets added for older
code to regression test a bug, we should be able to run that test on an older
kernel. This is the reason why we don't remove code that can still test an older
kernel and make sure it skips gracefully.

Hence, I won't be taking this patch.

thanks,
-- Shuah

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-15  9:56 Yang Xu
2021-12-15  9:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests/zram01.sh: Fix compression ratio calculation Yang Xu
2022-01-25 20:37   ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-26  6:08     ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-12-15  9:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/zram: Adapt the situation that /dev/zram0 is being used Yang Xu
2022-01-25 20:40   ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-13  6:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/zram: Remove obsolete max_comp_streams interface xuyang2018.jy
2022-01-25 20:52   ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-25 20:33 ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-26  5:19   ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-01-26  7:13     ` Petr Vorel
2022-01-26 17:35       ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2022-01-26 18:24         ` Petr Vorel
2022-01-26 18:37           ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-27  9:11         ` [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/zram: Skip max_comp_streams interface on newer kernel Yang Xu
2022-01-27  9:11           ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/zram01.sh: Fix compression ratio calculation Yang Xu
2022-01-27  9:11           ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/zram: Adapt the situation that /dev/zram0 is being used Yang Xu
2022-01-27 18:05           ` [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/zram: Skip max_comp_streams interface on newer kernel Shuah Khan
2022-01-28  1:17             ` xuyang2018.jy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=590c1f1c-2da1-583a-d055-83c15969cf80@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=aleksei.kodanev@bell-sw.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®